Governmental Policies For Education In Bolivia 

Introduction 

One of the particularities when analysing the Plurinational State of Bolivia is the state configuration that reflects the cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity of the country. This recognition and coexistence of multiple indigenous nations within Bolivian territory creates a series of specific challenges in the formulation of public policies. 

The fundamental principle guiding these particularities is the decolonisation and plurinationality of the Bolivian State. While decolonisation seeks to break away from colonial structures, which are the institutions, laws, and practices imposed during the colonial period and which continued to marginalise indigenous populations even after the country’s independence. Plurinationality refers to the recognition by the state of the equality and sovereignty of all indigenous nations and peoples within the country, rejecting the idea that the state should be homogeneous. (Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, 2009, Article 9). 

The Bolivian constitution, based on the principles of decolonisation and plurinationality, acknowledges the ethnic and cultural diversity of 36 indigenous nations and peoples1, as well as other ethnic groups, thereby ensuring that the cultures of these nations are protected by the State (Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, 2009, Articles 5, 30). Furthermore, the Bolivian constitution guarantees the self-management of indigenous peoples in their territories and the practice of their norms and customs (Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, 2009, Articles 2). 

These rights are reflected in an educational plan that seeks to respect and promote the country’s cultural and linguistic diversity. Consequently, Bolivian education is guided by interculturality and bilingualism, promoting instruction in both Spanish and indigenous languages. 

However, it is important to emphasise that this context is relatively recent. The current Bolivian constitution was approved in 2009 amidst significant changes in Bolivian society, including the election of Evo Morales as president, the first indigenous person to be elected to the executive office in the country’s history. Indeed, when examining Bolivia’s political precedents, one observes a country marked by significant political instability and profound social inequalities. It is worth noting that Bolivia has experienced more than 190 attempted coups d’état since its independence in 1825. 

This article aims to present educational policies put in place throughout Bolivian history and compile data that showcase the results of these measures. 

Evolution of Bolivian Educational Policies 

  • Education Code of 1955 

Bolivian education in the mid-20th century was characterised by its centralisation, with low coverage in rural areas and high dropout rates. During this period, the main government policy was the 1955 Education Code, also known as Code 55.  

Through this decree, the government expanded education to rural areas, which until then had been restricted to small sectors of society (IIPP, 2023, p.56). Additionally, the Education Code and the Teacher Classification Law were enacted, creating a better structure and organisation for school administration. Among these structures was the creation of the Ministry of Education (IIPP, 2023, p.56). 

Code 55 aimed to create a uniform structure for the Bolivian educational system, with the goal of enabling better planning and implementation of public education policies (Suarez, 1986). To this end, approximately 23% of the country’s general budget was allocated to education (IIPP, 2023, p.59). 

Despite the efforts, the results achieved by the 1955 Education Code were far from those projected (IIPP, 2023, p.61). The formulation of Code 55 was carried out by a non-indigenous and urban elite. In other words, the project lacked historical adherence, as most of the population was composed of indigenous peoples living in rural areas. 

  • Educational Reform Program (1994) 

The 1994 Education Reform sought to deepen the specifically educational character of the 1955 Education Code (IIPP, 2023, p.74). Two points stand out in the 1994 Education Reform. First, Educación Intercultural Bilingüe (EIB), a demand of indigenous peoples since the 1980s and considered an “instrument of liberation” (Arispe, 2020). The EIB was implemented in 1988 with the financial and technical support of UNICEF through an agreement with the Ministry of Education (IIPP, 2023, p.80). The second point was the expansion of teacher training centers in the country, amplifying professional development for educators.  

 As a result of the reforms, data from the Instituto de Investigaciones Pedagógicas Plurinacional show that in 2004, the school enrolment rate increased by 60% at the initial level, 34.5% at the primary level, and 94.8% at the secondary level. In addition, the number of school units increased from 12,000 in 1997 to more than 13,000 in 2004. The same happened with the number of educational units, which reached nearly 15,000 (IIPP, 2023, p.79). 

Despite its importance, Educación Intercultural Bilingüe (EIB) has been criticised for the way it was conducted. The main argument is that it consists of disseminating teaching and “official knowledge” through native indigenous languages (IIPP, 2023, p.82). 

  • Education Law No. 70 “Avelino Siñani-Elizardo Pérez” (2010) 

During a period of political and economic instability at the beginning of the century, Bolivia saw the emergence of Evo Morales, a union and indigenous leader, as the main figure in the 2005 presidential race. Elected with more than half of the total votes, Evo Morales implemented a series of structural reforms in Bolivia, nationalising gas, one of the country’s main commodities, and enacting a constitutional reform that established the Plurinational State of Bolivia. 

In education, the main policy was the implementation of Law No. 70 “Avelino Siñani-Elizardo Pérez”, which aimed to promote intercultural and bilingual education, decolonise the curriculum—replacing the traditional curriculum, which often marginalised indigenous knowledge, with one that incorporates local cultural knowledge and practices—and reinforce community participation, aiming to increase the involvement of communities and local authorities in school management and educational decision-making (Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, 2010). 

It is worth noting that, in addition to the Avelino Siñani-Elizardo Pérez Law, a series of other educational policies were formulated. According to the IIPP, Bolivian educational policy consists of a set of goods, services, and transfers that states mobilise to guarantee the right to education (UNESCO-IIPP, 2024). The table below highlights some of the current policies in place.  

Table 1. Policies according to focus of intervention. 

Current policies  Responsible agency 
Bono Juancito Pinto  Ministerio de Educación, Deportes y Culturas 
Programa Nacional de Alimentación Complementaria

Escolar (PNACE 2015-2020) 

 Ministerio de Educación, Deportes y Culturas 
Programa de Formación Complementaria para Maestras y

Maestros en Ejercicio (PROFOCOM) 

 Ministerio de Educación, Deportes y Culturas 
Programa Nacional de Alfabetización Yo Sí puedo  Ministerio de Educación, Deportes y Culturas 
Programa Nacional de Post Alfabetización  Ministerio de Educación, Deportes y Culturas 
Programa Centros de Apoyo Integral Pedagógico (CAIP)  Ministerio de Educación, Deportes y Culturas 
Centros de Apoyo Integral Pedagógico – Aula Hospitalaria  Ministerio de Educación, Deportes y Culturas 

Source: UNESCO (2024) 

Conclusion 

The results of the implemented policies have led to increased access to education and higher attendance rates among students. Data from the 2021 National Voluntary Report (UDAPE) show that, between 2015-2019, the attendance rate of the school-age population (4-17 years old) rose from 86% to 90.8%. The most significant increase in attendance rates was observed at the initial level, which rose from 36.5% to 61.3%, followed by the primary level, which increased from 96.9% to 98.7% (UDAPE, 2021, p.31). 

Another important piece of data is the number of enrolments. According to data from the General Directorate of Planning, in 2023, enrolment reached 2,951,164 students, of which 891,386 (30.20%) were from rural areas and 2,059,778 (69.80%) from urban areas. Regarding gender distribution, 1,445,375 (48.98%) were female and 1,505,789 (51.02%) were male (Ministerio de Educación, 2024). 

The Plurinational State of Bolivia has made substantial progress in providing education to its population. However, it still faces several challenges, including regional and geographic inequalities and income disparities. In addition to these issues, the country still grapples with a history of political instability that continues to affect the Bolivian people. 

 

Featured Photo by Alexander Grey on Unsplash

 

References 

Arispe, V. (2020). Educación intercultural: La perspectiva de los pueblos indígenas de Bolivia. Revista Caracol, (20), 167-186. Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo. https://doi.org/10.7440/res64.2018.03 

Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia (2009). Constitución Política del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.  Retrieved from http://www.gacetaoficialdebolivia.gob.bo/app/webroot/archivos/CONSTITUCION.pdf 

Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia (2010). Ley de la Educación Avelino Siñani-Elizardo Pérez. Retrieved from https://bolivia.infoleyes.com/norma/2676/ley-de-la-educacion-avelino-si%C3%B1ani-elizardo-perez-070  

Instituto de Investigaciones Pedagógicas Plurinacional (IIPP). (2023). Hitos de la educación en Bolivia – Serie Histórica N° I. Retrieved from https://www.ine.gob.bo/publicaciones/hitos-educacion  

UDAPE (2021). Informe Nacional Voluntario Retrieved from https://www.udape.gob.bo/portales_html/ODS/28230Bolivia_VNR.pdf 

Ministerio de Educación (2023). Equipe de Estatística Retrieved from https://seie.minedu.gob.bo/reportes/estadisticas/grupo1/matricula  

UNESCO (2024). Bolívia. https://siteal.iiep.unesco.org/pais/bolivia#Caracterizaci%C3%B3n 

Suárez Arnez, C. (1986). Historia de la educación boliviana. Don Bosco. 

Gang violence in Ecuador: Consequences for students 

Written by Iasmina-Măriuca Stoian 

Introduction 

The organized violence perpetrated by criminal gangs in Ecuador has almost taken over the lives of its citizens. Add menace and fear to fear, and several students have had to change the way they live and go to school forever. The unceasing violence follows students to school, as some students may be disrupted and killed in the process. It also hinders students’ education, and if businesses and schools are terminated, some may experience intimidation, losing any hope of ever going to school. Furthermore, it leads to economic and social insecurity due to the increase in poverty levels and unemployment where an affected student has reduced opportunity to pursue a decent future because of financial inability. The presence of gangs in the ensconced prisons and their occupancy of the streets has enabled forced recruitment and fear. Students’ capacity to learn and succeed is hampered by the hostile and unsafe environment that the persistent violence and instability produced. 

A persistent threat and an increasing concern 

In Ecuador, gang violence has been a major problem, especially in major cities like Quito and Guayaquil. The majority of killings in the nation have been committed by street gangs, including the Latin Kings, also referred to as the STAE. Concerns over the safety of the populace, particularly students, have been raised by this. To combat the rising threat posed by adolescent gangs, the government has put in place a number of measures, such as harsher penalties for individuals found in possession of weapons and without authorization. 

The fear and insecurity caused by the criminal gangs have made it necessary for students to change their patterns and live with fear daily. The education sector has been highly affected whereby shops and schools are closed to prevent being attacked, targeted, or extorted. The economic and social implications of the violence have left many in poverty and jobless, causing the majority to opt-out of essential amenities that would ensure the need for students to be in the precinct of their facilities. The recruiting of members and intimidation by gangs within prison and outside on the street has made the environment too hot for students since their safety is highly tampered with. Gangs have made the plight of students to be in an unsafe place by recruiting them and actively corrupting their morals. 

Gang violence in Ecuador has been a significant issue, especially in cities such as Guayaquil and Quito. The Latin Kings, also known as STAE, as well as other street gangs have been responsible for a large percentage of homicides in the country. This has raised concerns about the safety of the citizens, including students.  

Government’s response  

As a response to this issue, the government has implemented various policies to address the growing youth gang threat, including stricter punishment for those caught armed and without a permit. However, despite the risks of these policies, the government reports that its approach to security has been successful, with a significant reduction in homicide rates. This reduction in lethal violence has made Ecuador one of the safest countries in Latin America. The government’s approach to crime control has emphasized efforts to reach higher levels of social control based on policies of social inclusion and innovations in criminal justice and police reform. 

One notably innovative aspect of this approach was the decision to legalize several street gangs in 2007. The government claims the success of these policies can be seen in the drastic reduction in violence and criminality, including a decrease in inter-gang violence and homicide levels. The legalization process helped to improve the quality of life and security in communities, leading to a transformation in the way gangs operated and interacted with their surroundings. 

Consequences and impacts on students 

The key consequences of those violent acts were for students. The street gangs’ activity has generated the atmosphere of terror and fear, which influenced students’ capability to concentrate on the studies. Moreover, around 4.3 million children have been unable to receive an education due to the temporary transition to online classes and threats made by criminals. The latter factor also made it easier for school workers to conduct identification and try to tackle sexual violence cases, causing the reduction of the reports and the absence of help for victims. The organized crime spread only produced the negative effect, prompting the impossibility of elimination and secure reporting. Thus, the government should take urgent action to protect the rights of these children and ensure that they can learn in a safe and secure environment. 

Social inclusion as a key 

In response to this issue, the government has recognized the importance of engaging with marginalized subpopulations, including those involved in street gangs, to ensure the success of its Citizens’ Revolution. The approach to social inclusion and community empowerment has been crucial in addressing the root causes of gang violence and providing opportunities for behavioural change. 

Moving forward, the government needs to continue and highlight the social inclusion approach to street gangs as a model of best practices. This includes further formalizing the legalization process within institutions and developing strategies for effective intervention. By addressing the underlying social and economic factors that contribute to gang violence, the government can create a safer environment for students and all citizens in Ecuador. 

Conclusion 

In light of the significant consequences of gang violence on students in Ecuador, it is imperative for the government to prioritize social inclusion and reform efforts. By addressing root causes and promoting opportunities for behavioural change, Ecuador can create a safer and more conducive environment for students to learn and thrive. 

References

Brazil: School system dependency on electoral volatility

Written by Mayeda Tayyab

In Brazil, the right to free public education at any level is granted by the Federal Constitution. The responsibility of providing free public education thus falls under the federal system of government, at three levels – including the federal, individual states and municipality governments- thus decentralising education in Brazil. This system has led to increased corruption and misue of resources and funding by the political parties in charge for their own interests.

Decentralisation and corruption

Due to decentralisation, the quality of primary public education in Brazil has been negatively impacted. Since the majority of schools are managed by the municipal governments (5,570 different municipalities to be precise), managing and improving quality of education is much harder.

Primary education in Brazil is funded through FUNDEB (Fund for the Maintenance and Development of Basic Education). The federal government supplements funds which are then distributed by each state among its municipalities. Mayors have much freedom in deciding how these funds are spent, creating an opportunity for misuse of resources. 

Unlike other countries where the change in political party after general elections leads to change in top civil service positions, in Brazil this change trickles down to the municipality governments – reshaping local bureaucracy. This system has a huge impact on the quality of public education in Brazil. Because educational funding is in the hands of municipalities and under the control of mayors, the reshaping of local governments with general elections leads to the use of these public funds and resources by the political parties in charge to serve their own purposes.

Furthermore, the public education sector under municipalities is one of the biggest employers in Brazil. These jobs are also severely misused by corrupt politicians to reward the supporters of their political parties either as rewards or bribes. In most Brazilian municipalities, principles are nominated by politicians, which contributes to the politicisation of education in Brazil.

Moreover, FUNDEB funds make an important part of the poor and small municipalities, coupled with the low monitoring of these funds, it creates the perfect opportunity to carry out political corruption at the municipal level. According to the audits conducted by the Federal Government Controller’s Office (CGU) between 2001 and 2003, 13% to 55% of FUNDEB’s total budget was lost due to corruption (Transparencia Brasil 2005).

Corruption in Brazil is not limited to the municipal level. National and international studies show that corruption in handling of public funds for education has damaged the quality of education. According to Ferraz, Finan and Moreira (2012), approximately 60% of the corruption cases in Brazil are related to the education and health sector. In June 2022, Brazil’s education minister, Milton Ribeiro, was arrested on corruption charges involving crimes such as abuse of power and peddling. This was the third education minister that resigned from his post under President Bolsonaro, who promised to tackle corruption during his term in office.

Hence, decentralisation and politicisation of the education system in Brazil has led to serious corruption in the sector, leading to a decrease in the quality of education and resources.

Budget cuts

In 2022, President Bolsonaro cut a budget of 450 million euros from federal universities calling such educational institutions leftists breeding grounds. This led to huge demonstrations against the cuts across the country and created a dire situation for the higher education sector in Brazil, seriously affecting the functioning of universities due to difficulties in paying the staff.

Budget cuts in funding for universities has also led to declining infrastructure of institutions, damaged buildings, broken furniture, leaks and broken elevators. Universities also cannot afford to pay cleaning staff, leading to neglect of educational spaces. Apart from the physical damage to universities, at the start of the Covid pandemic, thousands of research grants were suspended, putting the entire higher education system in danger.

Impact

Many young people in Brazil are dropping out of primary education due to the lack of motivation, low quality of teaching and syllabus, or to enter the workforce early to provide for their families. The decentralised structure of education has led to these shortcoming in the quality of education and teaching, impacting the motivation of students to continue with their studies.

While public education makes up for the majority of the primary and secondary education, private education tackles precedence at university level. This has led to a disparity between students from advantaged and disadvantaged backgrounds. While students from privileged families opt for private higher education institutions, student finance funding has opened doors for students from poorer backgrounds to also join these institutions, although their number remains low.

Due to the lack of a one central system being responsible for public education coupled with the politicisation of education and corruption in this sector, Brazil’s education system – as it currently stands, is under the complete power of the politicians and political parties in charge. This issue cannot be overcome unless education is completely separated from the politically motivated institutions and managed through a system and group of people who are hired solely for their skills in the education sector.

References

Educational Challenges in St. Lucia

Introduction

St. Lucia is a small island located in the eastern Caribbean, just on the edge of the Atlantic Ocean. St. Lucia’s population of 167,591 is composed of 4 primary ethnic groups: Black/African descent (85.3%), mixed (10.9%), East Indian (2.2%), and other (1.6%).i The economy is upheld by three pillars: services (i.e., tourism) (82.8%), industry (14.2%), and agriculture (i.e., exports of bananas, cassava, coconuts, and other fruits/vegetables) (2.9%).ii

The right to education is protected by Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), which holds that “Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all based on merit”.iii

The St. Lucian Ministry of Education (MOE) affirmed these commitments in the Education Act of 1999 (revised 2001), Section 14, The Right to Education, which holds that “subject to available resources, all persons are entitled to receive an educational programme appropriate to their needs”.iv Furthermore, education is compulsory from ages 5-15.v

In addition, St. Lucia’s educational goals are reflected by the national Education for All (EFA) report. These goals include: “ensuring that by 2015 all children, particularly girls, children in difficult circumstances and ethnic minorities, have access to and complete free and compulsory primary education of good quality; ensuring that the learning needs of all young people and adults are met through equitable access to appropriate learning and life-skills programs”.vi However, St. Lucia continues to struggle with lack of funding/teacher training, and hair discrimination in academic settings. In this article, I will analyse these issues in the St. Lucian context, and outline recommendations.

Corporal Punishment

Corporal punishment stems from St. Lucia’s history of colonialism and slavery.vii St. Lucia was colonised by the English between 1605-1638, who exterminated the indigenous Arawak and Kalinago Caribs from the island. The island was quickly populated with an enslaved population of people from African descent. Slave owners would beat and torture these enslaved people to discourage revolts. Children were subject to beatings from both slave owners and elders (often as a means of ensuring they would not upset slave owners, and thus put themselves in danger). These power dynamics solidified corporal punishment as a cultural institution.

Furthermore, the British colonial and penal codes legalised it at home and in school.viii Section 50 of the Education Act 1999, permitted corporal punishment:

“(1) In the enforcement of discipline in public schools, assisted schools and private educational institutions, degrading or injurious punishment shall not be administered. (2) Corporal punishment may be administered where no other punishment is considered suitable or effective, and only by the principal, deputy principal or any teacher appointed by the Chief Education Officer”.ix

However, these practices have been adjusted. The Child Justice Act of 2018 and the CHILD (care, protection and adoption) Act of 2018 both reformed the state of corporal punishment in schools. Furthermore, in January 2019, an Order on the “suspension and ultimate abolition of corporal punishment in schools” was presented in the Cabinet.x It reformed section 50 of the Education Act 1999 by making CP illegal from 1 May 2019. Nyaley Lewis, an educator in St. Lucia, discusses her experiences with corporal punishment as a student and a teacher.

Ms. Lewis recalls that in infant and primary school, students would receive “a certain number of lashes”, often with a ruler, as a punishment. However, she recalls that children often “couldn’t tell what they had done wrong”. The violence she experienced still sits with her to this day. “I remember one time when I had been bullied…I had acted in self-defence…” as a result, the teacher had forced her (and the bully) to “kneel down in front of the class” and called them “wild animals”. She still remembers the teacher who did this, and “feels like [she] was done wrong”.

However, in practice, St. Lucia has made significant strides in eradicating corporal punishment in schools. Ms. Lewis informed Broken Chalk that “You’re not allowed to do it…nobody really does it anymore”. Instead, as one of the youngest teachers at her school, she aims to make her students feel comfortable in class. Ms. Lewis’ experiences align with the amendments made to Section 50 of the Education Act of 1999.

The Order on the suspension and abolition of corporal punishment affirms Article 19 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), which maintains that “States Parties shall take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social and educational measures to protect the child from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation, including sexual abuse, while in the care of parent(s), legal guardian(s) or any other person who has the care of the child…”.xi

The order also enforces Article 28 (2) of the CRC: “States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that school discipline is administered in a manner consistent with the child’s human dignity and in conformity with the present Convention”.xii These motions reflect progress with respect to corporal punishment in the Saint Lucian education system.

Funding & Teaching

In 2022, the St. Lucian government spent approximately 4.6% of its $2.5 billion GDP on education.xiii However, funding for impact research into the education system is often lacking.xiv This results in a disconnect between policy makers and the needs of students/teachers. SUMMA, an educational research institute, reports that this disconnect hinders St. Lucia’s education system.xv Research into policy impacts could create more effective education policies.

In addition, teachers require more training, support, and incentives from the government.xvi Professional development –such as, addressing gender gaps, and pedagogical training– remains a persistent issue. However, educators often feel unable to adapt to “multiple intelligences in the classroom”.xvii This results in achievement disparities between students and career stagnation for teachers.

Funding is central to this issue. Professional evaluations are necessary for teachers to receive benefits and promotions.xviii The certification process–i.e., qualifications which demarcate a secondary education teacher from a graduate teacher–remains underfunded.xix Teachers are therefore limited in their abilities to cater to different students’ needs. In addition, lack of teachers involved in school curricula and assessments reduce educators’ agency over the material being taught.xx Funding the systems which allow teachers to improve may allow them to help students grow as learners. Interestingly, the percentage of trained primary school teachers in St. Lucia has been relatively stable since 2008.

From 2008 to 2019, approximately 89-91% of primary teachers have been trained.xxi In contrast, only 74% of secondary teachers were trained in 2019.xxii These figures demonstrate steady improvement from previous years. However, due to a lack of available data, it is unclear if those trends have continued through the pandemic into 2023. The lack of information partially affirms SUMMA’s indication that the government is not investing enough in impact analysis.

Hair Discrimination

Although 85% of the St. Lucian population is Black, children with afro hair are systematically discriminated against in schools. Teachers discourage children from wearing locks, braids, or even large natural afros.xxiii However, these policies do not apply to children with non-curly hair (i.e., white/Indian/some mixed-race students). In practice, students are forced to shave their heads and restrict their self-expression, which contradicts the UN Charter on the Right of the Child.

Article 13 of The Convention of The Rights of The Child enshrines children’s right to freedom of expression.xxiv In turn, the Education Act of 1999–St. Lucia’s primary document governing education–maintains that students must adhere to standards “approved by the Chief Education Officer or the principal as the case may be, with respect to: (i) cleanliness and tidiness of the person”.xxv These standards must be revised to accommodate Black hair.

For example, in 2022, a Black student was banned from class due to the length of his hair.xxvi The student’s parents have since brought the issue to court, which ruled that the student be allowed to attend classes. However, it ignited a conversation surrounding discriminatory grooming policies in St. Lucia. Shawn Edward, the Minister of Education, emphasised that “this is 2022, some of the policies–some of the rules–which would have informed decisions at the school level 10 or 15 years

ago need to be revised”.xxvii

Ms. Lewis has also observed these dynamics as a student and in her own classroom. As a student, she enjoyed exploring her identity through her hair. However, she—like many other Black students—was not allowed to wear her afro. Teachers and students are still discouraged from wearing their natural hair. Ms. Lewis, nevertheless, actively tries to wear her afro while teaching. The politics surrounding grooming standards are also gendered. Ms. Lewis notes that “Girls are still not allowed to wear an afro”. The issue, as Mr. Edward alluded to above, is rooted in generational values. The older generation of teachers grew up with standards of cleanliness defined by British colonialists which emphasised maintaining authority.

Recommendations

The St. Lucian education system has three core limitations: funding, training teachers, and hair discrimination. St. Lucia’s budget must allocate resources towards (1) impact research and (2) training teachers. Impact research will help the government evaluate the efficacy of different policies. This can increase responsiveness to the needs of students and teachers. St. Lucia’s financial constraints mean that principals must carefully prioritise their resources. Students must be at the centre, but teacher training, which will support students, should follow. Second, training teachers is integral to career development and supporting the needs of different learners. This could mitigate the learning deficit between boys and girls, and students with learning disabilities. Third, the government must apply pressure on principals who discriminate against Black hair styles. New parameters of ‘acceptability’ need to be adopted. In doing so, students with different hairstyles can be secure in their right to self-expression in school.

Each of these issues have already been addressed either through laws or civil society. However, the division between these spheres has resulted in miscommunication between social interests and governmental proposals. A greater effort to solve problems, revise policies, and evaluate impact, is necessary on both sides.

By Benjamin Koponen

(Instagram account: benkoponen)

(LinkedIn: Benjamin Koponen)

Photo by Jean-Marc Astesana on flickr

References

Bailey, C. B., Robinson, T. R., & Coore-Desai, C. C. D. (2014). Corporal Punishment in the Caribbean: Attitudes and Practices. In Social and Economic Studies (Vol. 63, Issue 3/4, pp. 207–233). https://www.jstor.org/stable/44732891

Chitolie-Joseph, E. C. J., Ministry of Education, & Corporate Planning Unit. (20145). Education for All National Review Report: Saint Lucia. Saint Lucia Ministry of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230028.

Convention on the rights of the child (1989) Treaty no. 27531. United Nations Treaty Series, 1577. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/crc.pdf.

Education Act, 1999 (No. 41 of 1999), Part 2. Division 1. www.natlex.ilo.org.

Good Morning St. Lucia. (2022, September 28). Nigel Edwin Speaks on Hair Discrimination at Schools In Saint Lucia [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVXuaBLAPmQ&t=1s

Knight, V., Marshall, J., Depradine, K., & Moody-Marshall, R. (2021). Country review. Challenges and opportunities in the education system of Saint Lucia. Serie Working Papers SUMMA. N° 15. Published by SUMMA. Santiago de Chile. (Link does not work. Please copy and paste citation in your browser to find the source).

Saint Lucia – The World Factbook. (2023). https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/saint-lucia

Stuart, J. (2022, September 6). Father suing St Mary’s College for denying son entry due to hair. Loop News. Https://stlucia.loopnews.com/content/father-suing-st-marys-college-denying-son-entry-due-hair

The Central Statistical Office of Saint Lucia. (2021). Percentage of Trained Teachers in Secondary Schools, 1992/1993 to 2018/2019 [Dataset]. The Central Statistical Office of Saint Lucia. https://stats.gov.lc/subjects/society/education/percentage-of-trained-teachers-in-secondary-schools-1992-1993-to-2018-2019/

United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights | United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights#:~:text=Article%2026,on%20the%20basis%20of%20merit.

World Bank Open Data. (2022). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.XPD.TOTL.GD.ZS?locations=LC

i Saint Lucia – The World Factbook. (2023). https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/saint-lucia

ii Saint Lucia – The World Factbook. (2023). https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/saint-lucia

iii United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights | United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights#:~:text=Article%2026,on%20the%20basis%20of%20merit.

iv Chitolie-Joseph, E. C. J., Ministry of Education, & Corporate Planning Unit. (2014). Education for All National Review Report: Saint Lucia. Saint Lucia Ministry of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230028.

v Knight, V., Marshall, J., Depradine, K., & Moody-Marshall, R. (2021). Country review. Challenges and opportunities in the education system of Saint Lucia. Serie Working Papers SUMMA. N° 15. Published by SUMMA. Santiago de Chile. (Link does not work.

Please copy and paste citation in your browser to find the source).

vi Chitolie-Joseph, E. C. J., Ministry of Education, & Corporate Planning Unit. (2014). Education

for All National Review Report: Saint Lucia. Saint Lucia Ministry of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230028.

vii Bailey, C. B., Robinson, T. R., & Coore-Desai, C. C. D. (2014). Corporal Punishment in the Caribbean: Attitudes and Practices. In Social and Economic Studies (Vol. 63, Issue 3/4, pp. 207–233). www.jstor.org/stable/44732891

viii Chitolie-Joseph, E. C. J., Ministry of Education, & Corporate Planning Unit. (2015). 

Education for All National Review Report: Saint Lucia. Saint Lucia Ministry of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230028.

ix Bailey, C. B., Robinson, T. R., & Coore-Desai, C. C. D. (2014). Corporal Punishment in the

Caribbean: Attitudes and Practices. In Social and Economic Studies (Vol. 63, Issue 3/4, pp. 207–233). www.jstor.org/stable/44732891

x Bailey, C. B., Robinson, T. R., & Coore-Desai, C. C. D. (2014). Corporal Punishment in the
Caribbean: Attitudes and Practices. In Social and Economic Studies (Vol. 63, Issue 3/4, pp. 207–233). www.jstor.org/stable/44732891

xi Convention on the rights of the child (1989) Treaty no. 27531. United Nations Treaty Series,

1577, (p.5). https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/crc.pdf

xii Bailey, C. B., Robinson, T. R., & Coore-Desai, C. C. D. (2014). Corporal Punishment in the Caribbean: Attitudes and Practices. In Social and Economic Studies (Vol. 63, Issue 3/4, pp. 207–233). https://www.jstor.org/stable/44732891

xiii World Bank Open Data. (2022). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.XPD.TOTL.GD.ZS?locations=LC

xiv Knight, V., Marshall, J., Depradine, K., & Moody-Marshall, R. (2021). Country review. Challenges and opportunities in the education system of Saint Lucia. Serie Working Papers SUMMA. N° 15. Published by SUMMA. Santiago de Chile.

https://www.summaedu.org

(Link does not work. Please copy and paste citation in your browser to find the source).

xv Knight, V., Marshall, J., Depradine, K., & Moody-Marshall, R. (2021). Country review. Challenges and opportunities in the education system of Saint Lucia. Serie Working Papers SUMMA. N° 15. Published by SUMMA. Santiago de Chile. https://www.summaedu.org

(Link does not work. Please copy and paste citation in your browser to find the source).

xvi Knight, V., Marshall, J., Depradine, K., & Moody-Marshall, R. (2021). Country review. Challenges and opportunities in the education system of Saint Lucia. Serie Working Papers SUMMA. N° 15. Published by SUMMA. Santiago de Chile. https://www.summaedu.org

(Link does not work. Please copy and paste citation in your browser to find the source).

xvii Knight, V., Marshall, J., Depradine, K., & Moody-Marshall, R. (2021). Country review. Challenges and opportunities in the education system of Saint Lucia. Serie Working Papers SUMMA. N° 15. Published by SUMMA. Santiago de Chile. https://www.summaedu.org

(Link does not work. Please copy and paste citation in your browser to find the source).

xviii Knight, V., Marshall, J., Depradine, K., & Moody-Marshall, R. (2021). Country review. Challenges and opportunities in the education system of Saint Lucia. Serie Working Papers SUMMA. N° 15. Published by SUMMA. Santiago de Chile. https://www.summaedu.org

(Link does not work. Please copy and paste citation in your browser to find the source).

xix Knight, V., Marshall, J., Depradine, K., & Moody-Marshall, R. (2021). Country review. Challenges and opportunities in the education system of Saint Lucia. Serie Working Papers SUMMA. N° 15. Published by SUMMA. Santiago de Chile. https://www.summaedu.org

(Link does not work. Please copy and paste citation in your browser to find the source).

xx Knight, V., Marshall, J., Depradine, K., & Moody-Marshall, R. (2021). Country review. Challenges and opportunities in the education system of Saint Lucia. Serie Working Papers SUMMA. N° 15. Published by SUMMA. Santiago de Chile.

https://www.summaedu.org

(Link does not work. Please copy and paste citation in your browser to find the source).

xxi The Central Statistical Office of Saint Lucia. (2021). Trained Teachers in Primary Schools, 1994/1995 to 2019/2020 [Dataset]. https://stats.gov.lc/subjects/society/education/trained-teachers-in-primary-schools-1994-1995-to-2019-2020/

xxii The Central Statistical Office of Saint Lucia. (2021). Percentage of Trained Teachers in Secondary Schools, 1992/1993 to 2018/2019 [Dataset]. The Central Statistical Office of Saint Lucia. https://stats.gov.lc/subjects/society/education/percentage-of-trained-teachers-in-secondary-schools-1992-1993-to-2018-2019/

xxiii Stuart, J. (2022, September 6). Father suing St Mary’s College for denying son entry due to hair. Loop News. Https://stlucia.loopnews.com/content/father-suing-st-marys-college-denying-son-entry-due-hair

xxiv Convention on the rights of the child (1989) Treaty no. 27531. United Nations Treaty Series, 1577, (p.4). https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/crc.pdf.

xxv Education Act, 1999 (No. 41 of 1999), Part 2. Division 1. www.natlex.ilo.org.

xxvi Good Morning St. Lucia. (2022, September 28). Nigel Edwin Speaks on Hair Discrimination at Schools In Saint Lucia [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVXuaBLAPmQ&t=1s

xxvii Good Morning St. Lucia. (2022, September 28). Nigel Edwin Speaks on Hair Discrimination at Schools In Saint Lucia [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVXuaBLAPmQ&t=1s

Educational Challenges in Suriname

Suriname

Written by Yehia Murad

Bridging the Educational Gulf: Unveiling Suriname’s Urban-Interior Disparity and the Imperative for Inclusive Reform

  1. Introduction

The right to education is a fundamental human right, enshrined in international conventions and recognized as a cornerstone of personal and societal development. In 2015, the UN adopted the Sustainable Development Goals initiative (SDGs) as a universal call for global economic and human development to be achieved by 2030.i Quality education is ranked number 4 among the SDG list, with goals that intend to eradicate gender disparity, illiteracy, and unaffordable education. This article addresses the educational challenges of Suriname, a country that is situated on the north-eastern tip of the South American continent, with a rich history and a vibrant culture. Although Suriname is signatory to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Agenda, the South American state stands as a testament to the enduring struggle for human rights, particularly the right to education. Looking at Suriname’s education system, this right remains elusive for many ethnic groups in its civil society, particularly among marginalised groups who grapple with the intricate web of political, social, and economic challenges that cast shadows upon their educational aspirations and limit access to such opportunities.

Both the quality and quantity of education depends on the capacity of the state to provide public services to its people. To address such challenges in education, it is essential that we look at Suriname’s state institutions, its ethnic cleavages, and the state’s capacity in delivering public services for its people. A strong state capacity is crucial for the provision of education, as the quality of education often reflects the state’s ability to ensure a monopoly over the use of force.ii This monopoly is essential in maintaining order and stability within the state’s territory, creating an environment conducive to the establishment and maintenance of educational institutions. Moreover, exercising jurisdiction over its territory allows the state to implement and enforce educational policies effectively.iii As the state expands its apparatus, it inevitably includes remote areas into its territory, which is significant for educational provision. This inclusion not only extends the reach of educational policies and resources to these previously marginalized regions but also integrates them into the broader socio-economic framework of the state. Thus, the expansion and strengthening of state capacity play a pivotal role in enhancing the quality and accessibility of education across the entire territory, contributing to the overall development and prosperity of the nation. In addition, assessing a country’s state capacity involves its jurisdictional limitations within its own people, whether it has the capacity to regulate certain cities and communities more efficiently.

1.2 The Problem

According to a report by UNESCO in 2020, Suriname has been struggling with an education system characterised by high drop-out and repetition, with low passing rates from primary to secondary education (an average that hovers between 50 and 60%). Furthermore, education in Suriname is also marked by deep disparities between urban and rural areas.

According to a report in 2007 by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), major disparities exist in the delivery and quality of education between the coastal areas and the interior of the country, where a large quantity of primary schools in the latter are managed by teachers with limited training.iv Suriname is divided into three distinct areas: rural, urban, and the “interior”. The government is in the capital city of Paramaribo (urban), where the majority of the population is also based. The rural areas constitute the northern coastal zone, which encompasses the districts of Coronie, Nickerie, Commewijne, and Saramacca. Lastly, the ‘interior’ is retained for the sparsely populated and forest covered hinterland that covers part of the Amazon, stretching towards the southern border with Brazil.

Remoteness is a major contributing factor for educational inequality in Suriname, in addition to its diverse ethnic composition, gender, incarceration, and poverty. Ethnic composition and remoteness are indirectly correlated and could be evocative of Suriname’s weak state capacity to deliver public services. This article addresses how both remoteness and ethnic diversity are the main obstacles for the state to increase its capacity in providing education as public service.

  1. State Capacity and Institutions

2.1 Commitments to Education

Suriname has ratified a multitude of international and regional human rights procedures, placing various responsibilities for the state to ensure the education of indigenous and tribal peoples. Such procedures include the International Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), the International Convention on Eliminating all Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). These multilateral instruments abet the rights of tribal and indigenous peoples to (1) have access to quality education without any forms of discrimination, and (2) establish their institutions and educational systems, providing education in their own languages, in a manner appropriate to their cultural methods of teaching and learning.v

The binding state must comply with these rights, taking measures ‘in conjunction with indigenous peoples, in order for indigenous individuals, particularly children, including those living outside their communities, to have access to an education in their own culture provided in their own language’.vi Suriname is also binding to additional regional instruments, such as the Organization of American States (OAS) and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), which compels the state to commit to (1) the reduction of disparities in education between indigenous and non-indigenous peoples, and (2) provide all Caribbean peoples with opportunities for constructive learning and personal growth in knowledge, skills, and attitudes from the earliest years of life, from the school system into the workplace.vii

2.2 Government Policy

Suriname’s constitution, drafted in 1992, guarantees the right to compulsory, free, and equal education.viii In addition, the constitution explicitly states that it is within its obligation to eradicate illiteracy and enable all citizens to attain the highest levels of education. With regards to Suriname’s diverse ethno-linguistic demographics, the government developed a development plan for the period 2017-2021 with a goal for an education system that reflects the multi-ethnic, multicultural and multilingual Surinamese society. The plan dedicates the design of programmes that would make education more accessible for all segments of society, including young and older citizens.ix Most importantly, the plan recognises the lack of quality education in the ‘interior’ region, explicitly citing challenges such as the ‘lack of fully certified, insufficient physical infrastructure, the language barrier, the distance from home to school, and the lack of good and safe drinking water and continuity of electricity’.x

The Ministry of Education drafted a comprehensive ‘Implementation Plan for Education in the Interior’ for the period between 2008 and 2015xi. The plan attempts to undergird the construction and the restoration of classrooms and schools, increasing the percentage of households who can speak Dutch, and increasing the number of qualified teachers. However, in 2012, the President of Suriname, Bouterse, ended the special education policies for the interior, claiming the lack of necessity to have a distinctive policy for education in the district.

3 Educational Status Between Urban and Interior

The disparity in education exists between the interior areas, specifically the district of Sipaliwini, and the urban areas, where the former repeat classes more frequently, leave school earlier, and score substantially lower than their peers in urban areas on the standardised testsxii. In addition, children in the Sipaliwini district complete primary education much later than their peers in the urban areas: in 2008, 1.2% of indigenous and maroon children completed primary school before the age of 12, in contrast to 24% of urban childrenxiii. From 1986-1992, the ‘interior’ region of Suriname witnessed an armed conflict which resulted in the destruction of the region’s key infrastructure, including bridges, roads, schools, and housingxiv. The Government of Suriname (2003) submitted a report to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, in which it acknowledges the abandonment of education in the interior, with students having to cover long distances, and a lack of sufficient housing for teachers.xv Since Dutch is the main language, education is completely in this language, with books and other materials completely in Dutch.xvi However, children in the interior regions of Sipaliwini speak their own tribal language at home.

3.1 Schools

The interior also lacks sufficient secondary schools, with 2 out of the 59 junior public secondary schools being in Sipaliwini, and no senior secondary schoolsxvii. Due to the lack of secondary schools, the majority of students from the Sipaliwini attend secondary school in Paramaribo, the capital, which can be very costly for their parents, who need to pay for materials, uniforms, and boarding school. In an interview by UNESCO (2020), Loreen Jubitana, director of the Association of Indigenous Village leaders in Suriname, states that children experience a culture shock when they move to the city for school, and this is the main cause for dropouts.xviii In addition, conditions of schools in Sipaliwini are deteriorating, with a lack of access to drinking water and low electricity.xix

3.2 Teachers

Another significant disparity between remote and urban areas is the former’s lack of qualified teachers. There are four training institutes for training in Suriname, none of them are in the interior region. Even though the recently graduated teachers are expected to teach at the interior for 5 years before taking up a position in the capital, they are unwilling to go to the interior due to the lack of electricity and drinkable water. The lack of adequate infrastructure within schools, housing, transportation, and logistics reduces the incentive for qualified teachers to live in the interior.

4. Conclusion

Both indigenous peoples and maroon groups have preserved their own forms of governance and are formally acknowledged so far that the tribal leaders receive a monthly stipend from the government. Although culturally distinct from each other, indigenous and maroon communities share a strong socio-economic and spiritual link with the natural environment. Notwithstanding ongoing modernisation processes, both groups, especially those situated further away from urban centres, are largely still dependent on the forest for their subsistence (hunting, fishing and rotational agriculture); housing, transportation in the form of dugout canoes and health care, using medicinal plants for a range of remedies.

The government of Suriname must reform its education system to become more inclusive to its diverse population. To introduce a more inclusive education system, the state must empower the local governments of the interior, which will also simultaneously increase its capacity to deliver other public services. Empowering local governments is crucial for data collection, opening the channels of communication between local governments at the grassroots, and the central government.

The Surinamese government must increase its monopoly over the use of force, simply by increasing its capacity to regulate its territory, and open channels of communication with its indigenous populations. To do so, the government must compromise to avoid polarisation between the interior and the urban areas of the country. Concessions in the form of political representation must be made to the indigenous peoples of Suriname. Lastly, the government needs to design incentives for teachers working in the interior, in addition to the investment in the development of locally based teachers. Public service provisions, including housing, healthcare, and amenities must be provided.

Image Source: https://www.pexels.com/photo/the-flag-of-suriname-13966908/

Reference List

i UNDP. (n.d.) “The SDGs in Action” ://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals/quality-education

ii Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. Penguin Press. ISBN (paperback) 9780735224407; ISBN (e-book) 9780735224391

iii Weber, M. (1919). “Politics as a Vocation.” In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Trans. & Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 77-128). Oxford University Press.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305279035_Politics_as_a_Vocation_by_Max_Weber_in_Weber%27s_Rationalism_and_Modern_Society_edited_and_translated_by_Tony_Waters_and_Dagmar_Waters

iv UNESCO (2020). “Rurality and Education in Suriname: Education and Inclusion of Remote Populations in Suriname”. Global Education Monitoring Report. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374773

v UNESCO (2020). “Rurality and Education in Suriname: Education and Inclusion of Remote Populations in Suriname”. Global Education Monitoring Report.

vi United Nations. (2007). “United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples”. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf

vii Caribbean Community (CARICOM). (2018). CARICOM HRD 2030 strategy. https://issuu.com/caricomorg/docs/caricom-hrd-2030-strategy

viii Suriname. (1987). Constitution of Suriname. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Surinam_1992

ix Government of Suriname. (2017). “Ontwikkelingsplan” [Development Plan] 2017-2021.https://www.planningofficesuriname.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/OP-2017-2021- Ontwikkelingsprioriteiten-van-Suriname-1.pdf

Government of Suriname. (2017). “Ontwikkelingsplan” [Development Plan] 2017-2021.

x Government of Suriname. (2017). “Ontwikkelingsplan” [Development Plan] 2017-2021.

xi MINOW (2008). “Implementatieplan Onderwijs Binnenland” [Implementation Plan for the Education of the Interior]. Paramaribo https://www.studocu.com/row/document/anton-de-kom-universiteit-van-suriname/public-sector-management/sectorplan-onderwijs-2004-2008-finaal-concept/1139003

xii United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) 2007. Concluding Observations, Suriname, CRC/C/SUR/Co/2. https://bit.ly/350oRtT

xiii United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) 2007. Concluding Observations, Suriname, CRC/C/SUR/Co/2.

xiv UNESCO (2020). “Rurality and Education in Suriname: Education and Inclusion of Remote Populations in Suriname”. Global Education Monitoring Report.

xv Government of Suriname (2003), “Report submitted to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination”, CERD/C/446/Add.1, 1 October 2003. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CER D%2fC%2f446%2fAdd.1&Lang=en

xvi Government of Suriname (2003), “Report submitted to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination”, CERD/C/446/Add.1, 1 October 2003.

xvii UNESCO (2020). “Rurality and Education in Suriname: Education and Inclusion of Remote Populations in Suriname”. Global Education Monitoring Report.

xviii UNESCO (2020). “Rurality and Education in Suriname: Education and Inclusion of Remote Populations in Suriname”. Global Education Monitoring Report.

xix

Climate change and its impacts on girl’s education

Presented by Ariel Ozdemir, Faith Galgalo, Ioana-Sorina Alexa, Olimpia Guidi, Sterre Merel Krijnen

The barriers to girls’ equal access to education in Ecuador are multifaceted and deeply intertwined with socio-economic disparities and the differential impacts of climate change. Women are at the forefront of paid and unpaid work, representing 34% of unpaid domestic work. In June 2019, 17% of women were engaged in unpaid labour, a decrease from 18% in the previous month.1 Statistics on Ecuador’s female unpaid labour employment rate are updated quarterly, averaging 16% from Dec 2013 to June 2019, reaching an all-time high of 18% in March 2019 and a record low of 11% in June 2014.2

Women often hold the responsibility of caring for the home and family. This burden is exacerbated by household resource scarcity (such as water and services). Women, particularly in rural and indigenous communities, work significantly more extended hours than men, usually around 86 and 62 hours a week for women and men, respectively.3 In turn, this increased workload can restrict girls’ time and opportunities for education, as they may be required to assist with household tasks instead of attending school.

Another barrier that women and girls face is poverty, as 66% of women in Ecuador live in conditions of poverty, as opposed to 11% of men.4 These increased levels of poverty often result in women and girls taking on an increased domestic workload but also attempting to take on additional work outside the home to sustain themselves and their families financially.

Gender-based violence poses an additional obstacle to girls’ education by creating unsafe environments both inside and outside the home, particularly in regions with high rates of violence. In 2022, 332 femicides were documented in Ecuador, the highest number of the study period, a significant increase from the 197 cases in the previous year.5

Disparities in political representation and decision-making exacerbate the challenges faced by both women and girls, limiting their ability to advocate for their rights to education and protection.

This report was submitted to the Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights issued by OHCHR.

Input_to_HRC_report_on_equal_enjoyment_of_the_right_to_education_by_every_girl_pursuant_to_HRC_resolution_54_19

Download the PDF here.

Featured Image by Robin Erino on Pexels.

1 CEIC. (2019). Ecuador Employment Rate: Unpaid Labour: Female. Available at: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/ecuador/enemdu-employment-rate/employment-rate-unpaid-labor-female

2 CEIC. (2019). Ecuador Employment Rate: Unpaid Labour: Female. Available at: https://www.ceicdata.com/en/ecuador/enemdu-employment-rate/employment-rate-unpaid-labor-female

3 De ser sensibles al compromiso por la igualdad y el clima, CDKN Latin America, 2019. Available at: https://cdkn.org/es/noticia/generoecuador

4 ​​De ser sensibles al compromiso por la igualdad y el clima, CDKN Latin America, 2019. Available at: https://cdkn.org/es/noticia/generoecuador

5 Statista. (2023). Number of Feminicides Victims in Ecuador from 2013 to 2023. Available at:

French Guiana’s Education System: Current Challenges

Written by Juliana Campos.

France’s largest territory in South America, French Guiana, faces social and economic growth challenges still yet to be addressed by the French government, including difficulties in administering the Guianese education system.

Guianese population has doubled in the last 20 years and is now estimated at 301,099 inhabitants i. Recently, due to its status as an overseas department of France, the region has experienced a surge in immigration from neighbouring countries such as Brazil and Suriname. The uncontrolled immigration, along with inadequate infrastructure, poverty and elevated unemployment rates have significantly lowered the quality of life in French Guiana and the region faces several challenges which make access to basic services such as healthcare and education more difficult.

The issues which stem from social and economic inequality would greatly benefit from a bigger interest of the French government in improving and expanding education in French Guiana. Although substantial investments have been made in the last decade, money alone is not enough to ensure access to quality education.

The Guianese Education System

In French Guiana, education is free and mandatory from ages 6 to 16. Primary education lasts five years and, for that particular stage of school life, enrolment rates are as high as ever in bigger cities and are slowly improving in more remote areas where there aren’t as many resources, such as in Indigenous settlements. As it is the reality of other developing countries, high Primary School enrolment is contrasted by alarmingly high drop-out rates in Secondary School and High School.

One big contributing factor to this phenomenon is the fact that Primary school is usually cheaper for governments to provide and children in that age group are more likely to stay in school, as parents can’t yet leave them unattended at home while working. In Secondary education, however, many children are given extra tasks at home or in the growing informal market, some live too far from school, and others simply do not receive encouragement from family members to continue their studies.

Besides, it is worth mentioning that although all Guianese children have the right to attend school free of charge, studying is not free. Additional costs with transportation, clothes, food and school materials take a toll on low-income families and may affect students’ attendance rates.

To address this issue, the French government and Guianese authorities have come up with financial aid programmes that aim to motivate students and their families. The bonuses are given to scholarship holders, aiding 46.4% of all middle school and high school students in French Guiana.ii However, there is a lack of follow-up data on whether these measures are actually effective.

Teacher shortage and inequality

Another issue currently hindering quality education in French Guiana is the shortage of trained teachers. The number of licensed educators native to the region is insufficient compared to the number of students, a problem which resulted in overpacked classrooms as the Guianese population grew. This demand brought teachers from mainland France and adjacent countries in South America to work in French Guiana, causing new problems as these professionals are usually unaware of the region’s specificities.iii

In fact, one of the biggest challenges faced by the French government when administering education in French Guiana is its extremely diverse and multicultural society. Though teachers are given freedom to adapt materials to their students’ realities, textbooks are usually made in mainland France and classes are administered in French, the official language.

By erasing French Guiana’s history, geography, languages and heritage from textbooks and national exams, French authorities perpetuate the colonialist idea that mainland France’s history and culture are somehow more relevant than that of its other territories. As a result, children may find school contents difficult to understand or hard to relate to and can grow up unaware of many of their local heroes and historic figures. Besides that, this erasure has a direct effect on students’ self-esteem and may discourage them from continuing their studies.

The adaptation of school contents by local teachers cannot derive much from the French curriculum, as French Guiana students are also subjected to standardized national exams such as the Brevet, the Lower Secondary School exam, and the Baccalauréat, the French academic qualification exam.

Considering the points previously mentioned, it is unsurprising that Guianese students do not reach the same results as mainland French students. According to GrowThinkTank and INSEE (2014), the year of the study in French Guiana, only 76% of students aged 15 to 19 were enrolled in school, whether as pupils, students or apprentices, compared to 89% in mainland France. Furthermore, more than one in two Guianese no longer attend school from the age of 19, compared to 72% in mainland France at the same age.

This stark difference surely doesn’t come from lack of resilience, lack of intelligence or any characteristic exclusive to French Guiana’s youth. It is simply a product of inequality and lack of opportunity. Not being in school or dropping out of school has long lasting effects on young people, not only for their professional future, but also for their individual growth as human beings and as citizens, as school is also the main place where children socialise.

Kids and a Teacher in a Classroom / Photo by Mehmet Turgut Kirkgoz via Pexels

Education of Indigenous People and other minorities

Indigenous peoples play a substantial role in Guianese society, preserving culturally valuable knowledge, fighting for structural change and demanding protection of their territories. The erasure perpetrated by the French school curriculum affects these populations even more strongly, starting by the lack of data available on them. The International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA) affirms that, according to estimates, Indigenous peoples represent some 4% of the Guianese population, or more than 12,000 individualsiv, but there is no way to be sure, as the French Constitution prohibits the collection of race-based census data.

For decades in French Guiana, as well as in many adjacent regions, education was only present in the form of Catholic Schools, residential institutions where Indigenous children were forcibly interned and required to replace their traditions and religions with the Catholic ideals. Their native languages were also prohibited and children were taught French instead.

This serves as an example of how school can be used as political tactic, as colonial France risked the disappearance of invaluable Indigenous knowledge in order to maintain its territory. To this day, the French government has not directly dealt with the cultural loss from French Guiana’s period as a colony, and the erasure of Indigenous minorities is still a very present issue, with their history, culture and languages often being ignored by the French education system.

Future Prospects

French Guiana suffers from social and economic inequalities that would greatly benefit from an education system that is better tailored to its extremely multicultural society. The French government has a responsibility to invest in French Guiana’s education by building new schools and preparing and hiring native teachers, as well as training foreign teachers on how to approach French Guiana’s diverse society. This would partially solve the issue of overpacked schools, while also stimulating the local economy.

In addition to these measures, the government should also include more about the history, cultures, geography, climate and religions present in French Guiana in textbooks and standardized exams, which could make school more relatable to students and have a direct effect on the current drop-out rates. A special effort should be made to ensure Indigenous peoples and other minorities have access to quality education which also respects their culture and heritage.

In order to effectively make these improvements, it is crucial that the French government monitors the developments of their investments, either by conducting their own research on the ground or relying on local leaders and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). It is particularly important to collect data on enrolment rates for both Primary and Secondary Education, but also to understand what can be done to make sure these children receive quality education and encouragement to finish their studies.

References:

Educational Challenges in the Caribean Netherlands

Written by Sterre Krunen

Every student counts! In 2011, this slogan was the starting shot of the Caribbean and European Netherlands’ combined efforts to achieve educational equity and raise the quality of education on the islands of Bonaire, St. Eustatius, and Saba. Although quality and equity increased, the Caribbean Netherlands still dealt with significant educational challenges in 2023. This article will explore three main challenges: the care for students with special needs, multilingualism, and the effects of poverty.

This article analyses these three challenges to understand the accessibility and quality of education in the Caribbean Netherlands. But first, we need to go into the governance structure of the islands and their relationship with the European Netherlands to fully understand the barriers to tackling the challenges and efforts to address them. Also, the policy programs addressing education and the Education Agendas will be given special attention to show continuing good practices and to explain the context in which the current challenges continue.

This map shows us the Kingdom of the Netherlands, consisting of the European Netherlands and the Caribbean Netherlands. Both thank their name to their geographical location (CC BY-SA 3.0 DEED, Wikimedia Commons: TUBS).

Context-Specific Efforts to Overcome Education Inequity

In 1948, Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba became a part of the Dutch Antilles, a separate country within the Kingdom of the Netherlands. This changed in 2010: the islands became public bodies under the European Netherlands. Bonaire, St. Eustatius, and Saba are now local governments. An executive council, an island council, and the Dutch national government govern each island. Since this change, the islands have been referred to as the Caribbean Netherlands or the BES-islands.[i]

The Dutch Ministry for Education, Culture and Science is responsible for education. The schools on the islands are part of the Dutch education system and are monitored by the Netherlands’ Inspectorate of Education.[ii] The Dutch Ministry of Education, island councils and other stakeholders cooperated over the past twelve years to develop three policy programs, the Education Agendas.

The Education Agendas address educational equity between the two parts of the Netherlands. The idea is that it should not matter whether a child grows up in the European Netherlands or the Caribbean Netherlands; educational opportunities should be the same.[iii] The agendas address the specific context of the islands, as there are apparent differences from the European Netherlands in terms of culture, history, identity, language, scale, and organization.[iv]

The first two agendas address all three islands within one agenda. During the draft of the first Education Agenda (2011-2016), the level of education of many schools on the BES islands did not fulfil European nor Caribbean Dutch standards.[v] By 2016, most schools reached basic quality standards. However, particular areas still required improvement, again addressed in the second Agenda (2017-2020). [vi] The evaluation of this Agenda in 2020 shows that the main challenges are care for students with special needs and multilingualism.[vii]

While the third Education Agenda has not yet been published, it shall address these challenges.[viii] Furthermore, this agenda will address the challenges on each island separately, showing us a further commitment to context-specific policymaking, which hopefully improves the effectiveness of the third Education Agenda.

Educational Challenge I: Care for Students with Special Needs

The first challenge to discuss is the care for students with special needs. The right to education for children with special needs is a human right. It is taken up in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. While the last Convention was ratified by the European Netherlands, it does not apply to the Caribbean Netherlands.

A statement by the Expertise Centre Education Care Saba in 2021 summarizes the importance of care for these students:  “Students have the right to feel included in a safe and reliable environment with a structured pedagogical climate that is tolerant and encouraging for the development of all”.[ix] Now, children with special needs still face situations in which education is not tailored to them, meaning they do not profit from education as their peers or eventually drop out. Some children do not have access to education at all. Children with a higher need for care face difficulties.[x]

An example of inadequate care is the case of the ten-year-old Arianny on Bonaire. In 2022, the non-speaking girl was in the news as she could not attend education on Bonaire. Arianny had no access. Members of the Dutch parliament asked the then minister of Education, Dennis Wiersma, questions about her situation and the general situation on Bonaire. The minister reacted that all children should have access to education and are required to attend school, despite specific situations. The situation of Arianny and the research in other reports show us that is not yet the reality.[xi]

Why do these problems continue even after the two Education Agendas?

Student care on the BES islands is not comparable to care in the European Netherlands. While both experience similar problems, the expert centre on Saba notes that the main difference derives from scale and school culture, for example, the lack of awareness about the differing needs of students. This also applies to the other islands: children with special needs continue to follow the same program as their peers even though they need additional care. Moreover, there are relatively more students with special needs in Saba than in the European Netherlands. Possible explanations are a lack of education planning, differentiation in the classroom and special education needs teachers.[xii] Also, non-school-related causes affect children’s learning capabilities, such as poverty and domestic violence.[xiii]

This continuing lack of care for students with special needs thus asks for extra efforts. Renewed attention to this problem and policies need to tackle the problem, ensuring (continuance of) access to education for children like Arianny. Individual needs must be considered to optimize the learning experience of already vulnerable students.

Three kids sitting in the port of Kralendijk, the capital of Bonaire (CC BY-NC 2.0 DEED, Flickr: Globewriter).

Educational Challenge II: Multilingualism

Because of the different languages being spoken on each island, the language of education has been a thorny issue. Encountered challenges have been linguistic imperialism, learning challenges, and difficulty accessing tertiary education in Dutch.

On Bonaire, most inhabitants speak Papiamento as their mother tongue. On Saba and St. Eustasius, a local variety of Caribbean English has the upper hand. Despite this, Dutch was the only officially recognized language until the beginning of the century thus, education was in Dutch.[xiv]Nowadays, Papiamento and English can both be used in education. This represents the reality of the islands and a respect for local languages, making it a laudable development and a move away from linguistic imperialism.

However, it also causes new educational challenges, especially for learning results and further education. On Saba and St. Eustatius, the instruction language is English. Dutch is being taught as a foreign language.[xv] St. Eustatius switched to English as an instruction language in secondary education in 2014. Dutch proved to negatively affect learning outcomes and attitudes towards the Dutch language.[xvi] Saba has used English as the instruction language for a more extended period. However, only teaching Dutch as a foreign language hinders access to tertiary education. A low proficiency in Dutch means that students from these islands cannot access (all) tertiary education institutions in the European Netherlands.[xvii] This is especially problematic because the Caribbean Netherlands does not have any universities or universities of applied sciences, meaning inhabitants must move to pursue tertiary education.[xviii]

On Bonaire, education starts in Papiamento  – the native language of most students  – for the first two years of primary school. After these years, the instruction language became Dutch. This causes risks, as the case of St. Eustatius before 2014 showed. Furthermore, it can hinder learning outcomes as children might struggle with Dutch.[xix]

Therefore, multilingualism leads to specific challenges for students regarding access to further education and learning outcomes. It has been difficult to find a balance between Dutch, Papiamento, and Caribbean English that will tackle these challenges. A comprehensive language policy should be developed per island, where native languages and Dutch get a well-balanced place within the education system.

Educational Challenge III: Poverty

This third educational challenge goes beyond the education agendas as it intertwines with the overall situation on the BES islands: life on the islands has become increasingly expensive, and salaries and government support are insufficient to afford this.

This is why children on the BES islands noted poverty as one of the biggest challenges in their lives in 2021. And high poverty levels have continued since then: 11,000 people live below the poverty line in 2023. This is an extremely high number, considering that the islands’ total population is 30,000.[xx] In comparison to the European Netherlands: 800,000 live in poverty on a population of almost 18 million.[xxi]

What do such numbers mean for Caribbean students?

The rapport between the Dutch Ombudsman and the Children’s Ombudsman gives us the distressing example of Shanice, an 11-year-old Bonairean girl. Her mother is a single caretaker, working multiple jobs to stay afloat. She is more often at work than at home. Shanice cares for her younger brothers and sisters, looks after the groceries, and wash dishes instead of having the opportunity to focus on her studies. She goes to school: she likes it there. However, she often feels stressed because of her many responsibilities. Then, she cannot focus or learn. At the same time, Shanice pressures herself to learn: she wants to have a different life than her mom.[xxii]

This example shows how poverty gives children many responsibilities and negatively affects their learning. This example does not comprise all adverse effects. When not having enough money, healthy food is not always a priority, just like schoolbooks or having a good place to study. Extra school costs might not be paid. Parents and kids both experience high-stress levels, which might cause parents to be (emotionally) unavailable and children to have problems focusing. All negatively affect the school outcomes of children.[xxiii]

To tackle this problem of poverty and its effects, there should be governmental support to lift children and their parents from poverty. However, government policies are one of the causes of poverty: the model of living costs for the BES island presents living costs as lower than they are. Policies are developed based on this model. Moreover, this is a recurring argument for not higher social welfare: ensuring social welfare will demotivate people, and they will not work anymore.[xxiv] Hence, policies have contributed to the problem of poverty.

In addition, inhabitants of the BES islands do not always have access to the same resources European Dutch individuals have. These resources are, however, of great importance: European Dutch depend on them, but Caribbean Dutch cannot even access them.[xxv] This is possible because of the special status of the islands. The UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination noted in 2021 that such differences between the European Netherlands and Caribbean Netherlands are deplorable, that discrimination should be fought, and that equality should be pursued.

The Dutch government has been taking steps. A law ensuring the equal treatment of all citizens in the Netherlands will come into effect for the Caribbean Netherlands.[xxvi] The exact date is, however, unclear. Furthermore, the model of living costs will be adjusted in July 2024. From that date onwards, inhabitants of the Caribbean Netherlands will be able to breach the gap between social security and living costs that exists now. In addition, the Dutch government does undertake other efforts to address poverty, but the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights judges them to be insufficient. [xxvii]

The Dutch government seems to increasingly take responsibility for the high poverty levels in the Caribbean Netherlands. A necessary development: despite statements such as ‘Every student counts!’, the Dutch government has discriminated against Caribbean Dutch citizens. The unfavourable treatment they experience puts them behind their fellow citizens in Europe.

Conclusion

Education quality has increased significantly on the Bonaire, St. Eustatius, and Saba islands. Great efforts have been made to tailor policies to the local contexts of the islands, which is essential for education equity between the European and Caribbean Netherlands. This is praiseworthy and will hopefully continue with the third Education Agenda.

However, great educational challenges persist on the islands. Benefits from and access to education are under pressure.  While multilingualism affects all students, poverty and the lack of special care affect some students disproportionately. Furthermore, the problem of poverty and lack of special care show clear signs of discrimination, which should be condemned and stopped. The case of the islands of Bonaire, St. Eustatius and Saba thus indicates the need for policies tackling discrimination and a comprehensive plan to improve education further.

References

Cover Image: A young girl in costume during a parade on Bonaire (CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED, Wikimedia Commons: Atsme).

[i] Rijksoverheid. (N.d). Caribisch deel van het Koninkrijk. Rijksoverheid. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/caribische-deel-van-het-koninkrijk/rechtspositie-politieke-ambtsdragers-bonaire-sint-eustatius-saba

[ii] Rijksoverheid. (N.d.). Caribisch deel van het Koninkrijk. Rijksoverheid.

[iii] Rijksdienst Caribisch Nederland. (N.d). Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap. Rijksdienst Caribisch Nederland. https://www.rijksdienstcn.com/onderwijs-cultuur-wetenschap

[iv] Rijksdienst Caribisch Nederland. (N.d). Onderwijsagenda voor Caribisch Nederland: samen werken aan kwaliteit. Rijksdienst Caribisch Nederland. 1. https://www.rijksdienstcn.com/binaries/rijksdienstcn-nederlands/documenten/brochures/onderwijs-cultuur/onderwijsagendas/eerste-onderwijsagenda-caribisch-nederland/index/Eerste_Onderwijsagenda_NL.pdf

[v] Rijksdienst Caribisch Nederland. (N.d). Onderwijsagenda voor Caribisch Nederland: samen werken aan kwaliteit. 1.

[vi] Inspectie van het Onderwijs. (2017). De Ontwikkeling van het Onderwijs in Caribisch Nederland 2014-2016. Onderwijsinspectie. 39-41. https://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/documenten/rapporten/2017/03/21/rapport-onderwijsontwikkelingen-caribisch-nederland-20142016

[vii] Buys, Marga. (2021). Evaluatie Tweede Onderwijsagenda Caribisch Nederland 2017-2020. Eerste Kamer. 20. https://www.eerstekamer.nl/overig/20210708/evaluatie_tweede_onderwijsagenda/document3/f=/vlkch545eltd_opgemaakt.

[viii] Buys, Marga. (2021). Evaluatie Tweede Onderwijsagenda Caribisch Nederland 2017-2020. Eerste Kamer. 22.

[ix]. Langerak, Lisa. (2021). Inclusive Special Education on Saba. Expertise Center Education Care. 2. https://www.learningsaba.com/2021_Care_Coordinator/210614%20Project%20plan%20Inclusive%20Special%20Education%20Saba.pdf

[x] Buys, Marga. (2021). Evaluatie Tweede Onderwijsagenda Caribisch Nederland 2017-2020. Eerste Kamer. 20.

[xi] Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap. (2022). Antwoord op schriftelijke vragen van de leden Van den Berg en Peters (beiden CDA) over het bericht ‘Moeder vraagt om hulp: 10-jarige Arianny kan op Bonaire niet naar school. Open Overheid. 2-3. https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/ronl-b6d4ce01be3eac9fe87130ee6b9b0f08d72e664e/pdf

[xii] Langerak, Lisa. (2021). Inclusive Special Education on Saba. Expertise Center Education Care. 5.

[xiii] Kinderombudsman. (2021). Als je het ons vraagt: kinderen op de BES-eilanden. Kinderombudsman. 10-11. https://www.kinderombudsman.nl/publicaties/rapport-als-je-het-ons-vraagt-onderzoek-kinderen-op-de-bes

[xiv] Mijts, Eric, Ellen-Petra Kester and Nicholas Faraclas. (2014). Multilingualism and education in the Caribbean Netherlands. A community-based approach to a sustainable language education policy. The case study of St. Eustatius. NT2. 2. https://www.nt2.nl/documenten/meertaligheid_en_onderwijs/kambel_meertaligheid_binnenwerk_eng_h5.pdf

[xv] Rijksdienst Caribisch Nederland. (N.d). Taal in het Onderwijs. Rijksdienst Caribisch Nederland. https://www.rijksdienstcn.com/onderwijs-cultuur-wetenschap/ouders-leerlingen/taal-in-het-onderwijs

[xvi] Polak, Anneke. (2014). Engels als instructietaal ‘ingrijpend’. Caribisch Netwerk. https://caribischnetwerk.ntr.nl/2014/06/19/engels-als-instructietaal-statia-ingrijpend/

[xvii] Buys, Marga. (2021). Evaluatie Tweede Onderwijsagenda Caribisch Nederland 2017-2020. Eerste Kamer. 20.

[xviii] Rijksdienst Caribisch Nederland. (N.d). Higher Education and Science. Rijksdienst Caribisch Nederland. https://english.rijksdienstcn.com/education-culture-science/higher-education-and-science

[xix] Kloosterboer, Karin. (2013). Kind op Bonaire, St. Eustatius en Saba. UNICEF. 15. https://content.presspage.com/uploads/688/samenvattingkindopbeslowres.pdf

[xx] NOS. (2023). Derde van Caribisch Nederland onder armoedegrens, pleidooi voor hoger minimumloon. NOS

https://nos.nl/artikel/2493122-derde-van-caribisch-nederland-onder-armoedegrens-pleidooi-voor-hoger-minimumloon

[xxi] Den Hartog, Tobias and Laurens Kok. (2023). Op weg naar 1 miljoen armen: bij dit inkomen leef je volgens de overheid in armoede. Het Parool.

https://www.parool.nl/nederland/op-weg-naar-1-miljoen-armen-bij-dit-inkomen-leef-je-volgens-de-overheid-in-armoede~b9c9b7ed/

[xxii] Kinderombudsman, and Nationale Ombudsman. (2023). Caribische kinderen van de rekening. Kinderombudsman. 4. https://www.nationaleombudsman.nl/publicaties/rapporten/2022058#:~:text=Dit%20rapport%20beschrijft%20de%20knelpunten,zelf%20als%20voor%20hun%20kinderen.

[xxiii] Nederlands Jeugdinstituut. (N.d). De invloed van armoede op schoolprestaties. Nederlands Jeugdinstituut. https://www.nji.nl/armoede/invloed-op-schoolprestaties

[xxiv] Haringsma, Phaedra. (2022). Zo wordt ongelijkheid tussen Europees en Caribisch Nederland al jaren in stand gehouden. De Correspondent. https://decorrespondent.nl/13713/zo-wordt-ongelijkheid-tussen-europees-en-caribisch-nederland-al-jaren-in-stand-gehouden/2f84b44f-db88-0d7c-029d-9c1d00ae02b3

 

[xxvi] Netherlands Institute for Human Rights. (2023). Caribisch Nederland krijgt wetgeving gelijke behandeling. College voor de Rechten van de Mens. https://www.mensenrechten.nl/actueel/nieuws/2023/01/25/caribisch-nederland-krijgt-wetgeving-gelijke-behandeling#:~:text=Iedereen%20die%20zich%20in%20Nederland,2010%20bijzondere%20gemeentes%20van%20Nederland

[xxvii] Netherlands Institute for Human Rights. (2023). Report to UN Committee on economic, social and cultural human rights in the Netherlands. College voor de Rechten van de Mens. 4-6. https://publicaties.mensenrechten.nl/file/5803a853-0bbe-b495-7932-3bb751e0aed4.pdf

Unlocking Venezuela’s future: Addressing Primary Educational Challenges

Written by Olimpia Guidi

Education stands as the cornerstone of a nation’s future, casting a guiding light on the path to development, prosperity, and a brighter tomorrow. The pursuit of knowledge is not just a fundamental human right but a critical catalyst for individual, societal, and economic progress worldwide, transcending borders to unlock opportunities for personal growth and national success. In Venezuela, at the heart of South America, the imperative of education becomes even more pronounced due to the nation’s myriad political, economic, and social challenges. 

This article will delve into the primary challenges within Venezuela’s education system, from funding shortages to deteriorating infrastructure, plummeting enrollment, and diminishing educational quality. These challenges serve as a wake-up call, demanding a closer examination of Venezuela’s educational landscape (Marquez, 2023).Venezuela’s education woes are tightly woven into its past, present, and future fabric. By proactively addressing these issues, the nation can reinvigorate its education system and, by extension, its prospects.

Historical Context

Venezuela’s educational system mirrors the nation’s complex history. It’s vital to traverse the educational past to understand its current challenges. Before the Spanish conquest, indigenous cultures had their knowledge transmission methods. In the 16th century, Spanish colonists introduced significant changes. The Catholic Church established educational institutions to convert and educate the native population (Haggerty, 1990).

In the early 19th century, Venezuela’s fight for independence recognised education as a nation-building tool. In 1827, under Simón Bolívar’s leadership, a pioneering statute was enacted, laying the foundation for a public education system and primary and secondary schools (Bushnell, 1983). The 20th century brought educational expansion and illiteracy eradication (Gonzales, 2019), altering curricula and enhancing teacher training.

However, recent decades have seen Venezuela’s educational system grapple with economic crises, political turmoil, and budget constraints, impacting its stability and quality. Reforms were introduced in response to these challenges, yielding mixed outcomes. The introduction of the Higher Education Law in 2010 was part of a broader set of education reforms. Unfortunately, these reforms, including changes in university autonomy and regulations for social inclusion, faced implementation challenges.

The law’s impact raised concerns about academic freedom and compromised the quality of education in the higher education sector, contributing to the overall challenges within Venezuela’s educational system. This connection between historical context and contemporary reforms highlights the complexity of the issues facing the nation’s education system.

Current Educational Challenges

In Venezuela’s contemporary educational landscape, several challenges undermine the holistic development of the nation’s youth. These complex issues are deeply intertwined with political and economic turmoil, affecting access to education and financial resources. The following sections will delve into these problems, exploring their consequences and the ongoing search for effective solutions.

Infrastructure and Maintenance Issues

The deteriorating infrastructure of educational institutions threatens the basic foundations of high-quality education in Venezuela. The safety and supportive learning environment essential to fostering great education has been compromised by deteriorating school structures and poor upkeep (Marquez, 2023). For instance, many schools in Caracas, the nation’s capital, have dilapidated infrastructure, including leaking roofs and collapsing walls.

In addition, 85% of public schools lack internet access, 69% experience severe electrical shortages, and 45% lack running water (World Bank, 2023). These startling figures highlight the critical need for infrastructure renewal to provide Venezuela’s pupils with a secure and supportive learning environment.

Worries have been expressed about the infrastructure problem, which not only jeopardises the well-being of educators working within these unstable premises but also looms over the holistic growth of children. Apprehensions have arisen regarding the possible impacts of this challenge on students’ psychological well-being and physical security. It is imperative to address these multifaceted infrastructural challenges to ensure that students can learn in a safe, supportive, and conducive environment, which is fundamental to their educational journey.

Brain Drain and Teacher Shortages

Venezuela’s educational system grapples with a two-pronged challenge stemming from teachers’ scarcity and inadequate income. This dilemma is exacerbated by the ‘brain drain’ – the departure of educated professionals seeking better prospects abroad – and the consequent shortage of qualified educators. Particularly evident in regions like Mérida, once a vibrant university town, this loss of skilled teachers has left schools in a state of understaffing, resulting in significant imbalances in student-teacher ratios (The World Factbook, 2022).

The scarcity of educators with the necessary qualifications further compounds the issue. Some teachers have abandoned the profession or sought opportunities abroad due to wage disparities and difficult working conditions (Zea, 2020). The high student-teacher ratios alone pose a significant burden, but the exodus of talent exacerbates the problem, hindering the ability to deliver targeted instruction and effective pedagogical engagement.

It is essential to underscore that the shortage of teachers in Venezuela directly results from the ‘brain drain’ and the inadequate compensation provided to educators. Many teachers, unable to make a decent living on their salaries, have resorted to strikes and protests in response to this dire situation. This twofold dilemma significantly compounds the challenges faced by the educational system, raising serious concerns about the continuity and quality of education in the nation.

Venezuelan Refugees in Brazil, 2018. Photo by Romério Cunha / Casa Civil Presidência da República via Flickr

Impact of the Economic Crisis                          

Funding for the education sector has dramatically decreased due to Venezuela’s economic crisis. The lack of money leaves schools with few resources to deliver high-quality education and impacts the provision of necessary services and teacher salaries. Many schools find it challenging to keep up with basic maintenance, much less update their curricula or invest in cutting-edge technology.

The government’s ability to fund education investments has also been limited since other budgetary priorities like infrastructure and healthcare have taken precedence (UNESCO, 2023). Because of this, efforts to deliver a high-quality education are hampered, and funding for education is disrupted.

Furthermore, the financial crisis has reached a point where many parents find it increasingly challenging to afford to send their children to school. The economic hardships have pushed families to make agonising choices, sometimes prioritising essentials like food and shelter over their children’s education (Sanchez & Rodriguez, 2019).

This heartbreaking reality has led to declining student enrollment as more children are forced to stay out of school due to financial constraints. It also highlights a worrisome trend where access to education is no longer a guarantee for many Venezuelan children, further deepening the educational challenges faced by the country.

The financial crisis has not only impacted education spending but has also restricted the ability of families to provide their children with the fundamental right to education.

Political Instability and Impact on Education

Political unrest in Venezuela has developed into a recurrent and disruptive force that significantly impacts the educational system. The sudden closure of schools, the postponement of courses, and the relocation of pupils are characteristics of these situations.The unpredictability of such occurrences adds a chaotic element to the educational environment, leaving students and teachers unsure about the continuation of their academic endeavours.

The country’s approach to education has suffered from a lack of continuity and coherence, one of its most severe effects due to this political unrest.Every time a new leadership is appointed, educational policies are revised, resulting in a fractured and fragmented foundation for education. It is difficult to execute long-term strategies for improvement because of these frequent changes that disturb the educational ecology (Education World, 2023).

This puts teachers and students in limbo and makes it harder to provide high-quality education consistently. Political unrest disrupts the operation of the educational system and affects students’ educational experiences in a long-lasting way.

In addition, the effects of the unrest transcend far beyond the short-term interruptions to Venezuela’s educational system. The nation’s future is now in doubt due to the instability, which prevents the growth of an educated and skilled labour force due to ongoing changes in educational and political policies. The potential for advancement in the country is jeopardised as pupils struggle with missed classes and teachers battle to keep up with ever-shifting mandates. Political unrest’s long-term effects on education are felt in the classroom and Venezuela’s broader socioeconomic prospects, making it difficult for its population to navigate an unsteady educational environment.

Efforts and Initiatives

The government of Venezuela continues to deny the terrible condition of the educational system in the nation. The prospects for Venezuelan school children would be quite bleak if not for the brave efforts of foreign humanitarian groups, private charities, and the helpful aid from parents and local volunteers. These youngsters, who lack access to school, will have an unclear future and will be more vulnerable to exploitation. Numerous other organisations are stepping forward to start programs to change the situation due to the government’s apparent unwillingness to confront the problems in the educational system.

Among them is UNICEF, a leading advocate for children’s rights worldwide. Their 2021 initiatives cover a variety of crucial activities:

• Balanced School Meals: To promote the healthy development of over 110,000 students, balanced school meals are provided.

• School Supplies: Providing more than 304,000 kids with necessary school supplies can make their educational journey easier.

• Life Skills Development: Through specialised programs, equipping more than 50,000 teenagers with useful life skills.

• Preparing more than 10,000 teachers through programs, such as those geared toward a safe return to school.

• Support for Teachers: Enabling nearly 7,000 teachers to carry out their vital tasks more efficiently by providing them with food incentives, financial aid, and technological equipment.

In addition to UNICEF’s efforts, the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) significantly contributes to resolving Venezuela’s educational problems. NRC works with various partners to develop solutions and assist disadvantaged families in keeping their children in school.

NRC is aware of the complicated circumstances of displacement and financial difficulties that frequently drive children out of school. This is especially crucial in light of the socioeconomic crisis that has resulted in a paucity of school supplies, deteriorating infrastructure, and a lack of teachers.

To support students returning to school after lengthy absences, NRC’s holistic approach includes disseminating instructional resources, enhancing teacher training, and improving school infrastructure to improve accessibility and hygiene. These programs address critical issues and highlight the possibility of significant reform in the country’s educational system, offering a glimmer of hope for the future of education in Venezuela.

Conclusion

Significant funding shortfalls, deteriorating infrastructure, dropping enrollment rates, and declining educational standards are some significant issues facing Venezuela’s educational system. It is imperative that these issues are addressed in the context of the nation. When we examine these problems through the prism of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it becomes clear that they play a crucial role in the trajectory of the nation’s growth. In particular, SDG 4, which aims to guarantee inclusive and high-quality education for all, is closely related to these educational difficulties.

The change in the educational system is crucial for the welfare of the Venezuelan population and possibilities for the future. It is crucial to acknowledge that access to high-quality education is a fundamental human right and a pillar of greater social and economic development, in keeping with the global commitment to the SDGs. Venezuela may navigate a road towards reaching the SDGs and pave the way for a more egalitarian, successful, and promising future for all its residents by making significant efforts to solve these educational difficulties.

References
  1. Bushnell, D. (1983). The Last Dictator-ship: Betrayal or Consummation? The Hispanic American Historical Review, 63(1), pp.65–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/2515359
  • Haggerty, R.A. (1990). Venezuela: A Country Study. Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress.
  • Marquez, H. (2023). Venezuela’s Educational System Heading Towards State of Total Collapse. Inter Press Service.
  • Norwegian Refugee Council. (2022). NRC in Venezuela.
  • Sanchez, E., Rodriguez, L. (2019). 4 Ways the Venezuelan Crisis is Affecting Children’s Education.  Global Citizen.
  • The World Factbook. (2022). Explore All Countries Venezuela.
  • UNESCO. (2023). Country Profile: Venezuela.
  • World Bank. (2023). Education in Venezuela.
  • Garcia Zea, D. (2020). Brain drains in Venezuela: the scope of the human capital crisis. Human Resource Development International, 23(2), pp.188-195.

Featured Image: Venezuela, 2016. Photo by tomscoffin via Flickr

Universal Periodic Review of Uruguay

The following report has been drafted by Broken Chalk as a stakeholder contribution to the Oriental Republic of Uruguay.

  • Education in Uruguay is accessible at all levels. Public education is centrally regulated by the National Public Education Administration (CODICEN). At the same time, there is also a Ministry of Education and Culture, which partly regulates private pre-primary and tertiary education and coordinates the education system but does not formulate policies.[i]
  • Uruguayan children spend 11 years in compulsory education. The last three years of secondary education are non-compulsory, and they prepare students for higher education or provide them with vocational skills. [ii]
  • Many children attend public institutions: 86% of children in early childhood education are enrolled in public schools.[iii]
  • The gross enrolment in primary school was 104.19% in 2020, slightly higher than the world average of 102.59%, while 119.9% of children enrolled in secondary education, significantly higher than the 94.51% world average. [iv]
  • It is also notable that approximately 68% of people in Uruguay had tertiary education in 2020, which was higher than the international average of 52%.[v]
  • Broken Chalk (BC) is pleased to note that equity is becoming an ever-greater focus in Uruguayan education to ensure that children from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds are not left behind. The Community Teacher Programme, the Teacher + Teacher Programme, the Tutoring Project and the Education Engagement Programme all provide opportunities for schools to offer extra help to students in need.[vi]
  • BC also admires that since 2015, compulsory education starts at age 3.[vii]
  • While there are positive indicators of the performance of the Uruguayan educational system, the country’s educational sector does display issues. Problems often relate to socioeconomic inequalities and discrimination based on ethnicity.
  • In the PISA survey, Uruguayan students scored lower than the OECD average in reading, mathematics, and science. Socioeconomically advantaged students not only outperform their socioeconomically disadvantaged peers by 99 points, which is above the OECD average of 89 points, but are also largely secluded in different institutions. This means a socioeconomically disadvantaged child has a mere 14% chance of attending the same school as their more affluent peers.[viii]
  • Dropout rates are also a prominent issue in Uruguay: only 45 in every 100 people between 20-23 hold a secondary education diploma, one of the worst statistics in Latin America.[ix]
  • As Uruguay ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1990, the state must commit to carrying out its duties and obligations, which include the insurance of equal opportunity for all children. Thus, BC urges Uruguay to address all issues which prevent the realisation of the rights set out in the Convention.

By Johanna Farkas

Download the PDF.

46th_Session_UN-UPR_Country_Review_Uruguay_S

References

[i] Santiago, P., et al. (2016), OECD Reviews of School Resources: Uruguay 2016, OECD Reviews of School Resources, OECD Publishing, Paris; 45.

[ii] Uruguay Education. “The Education System of Uruguay – Primary, Secondary and Higher.” www.uruguayeducation.info. https://www.uruguayeducation.info/education-system/education-profile.html. (Accessed August 14, 2023.).

[iii] Santiago, P., et al. (2016), OECD Reviews of School Resources: Uruguay 2016, OECD Reviews of School Resources, OECD Publishing, Paris; 49.

[iv] The Global Economy. “Uruguay Primary School Enrollment – Data, Chart.” The Global Economy. Accessed August 14, 2023. https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Uruguay/Primary_school_enrollment/.; The Global Economy. “Uruguay Secondary School Enrollment – Data, Chart.” The Global Economy. (Accessed August 14, 2023.). https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Uruguay/Secondary_school_enrollment/.

[v] Ibid.

[vi] Santiago, P., et al. (2016), OECD Reviews of School Resources: Uruguay 2016, OECD Reviews of School Resources, OECD Publishing, Paris; 19.

[vii] Uruguay. “National Report Submitted in Accordance with Paragraph 5 of the Annex to Human Rights Council Resolution 16/21* – Uruguay.” Uruguay, November 2018; 15.

[viii] OECD. “Country Note: Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2018.” OECD, 2019. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/. (Accessed August 14, 2023.): 4-5.

[ix] Cura, Daniela , Nelson Ribeiro Jorge, Martín Scasso, and Gerardo Capano. “Challenges and Opportunities for Equity in Education: Main Barriers to Accessing and Using Ceibal Tools for Children and Adolescents in Uruguay.” Ceibal and UNICEF, 2022; 7.

Cover image by Linda on Flickr.