Introduction
Basic education in Argentina has a long history, marked by important legal milestones and public policies that have shaped the educational system. One of the fundamental pillars of this development was Law 1420 of 1884, which established free and compulsory public primary education (Ministerio de Educación, 2006a). This law aimed to promote social integration and the formation of citizens for the new Argentine Republic, guaranteeing access to education for all children between the ages of 6 and 14 (Ministerio de Educación, 2006a). Law 1420 also emphasised the secular nature of education, an innovative aspect for the time, removing religious influence from the classroom (Ministerio de Cultura, 2020).
In the 20th century, the educational system continued to expand but faced challenges related to regional inequality and funding. During the military dictatorship (1976-1983), there was a repression of academic freedoms and a reduction in education funding. With the return to democracy in the 1980s, the country began to rebuild its educational system.
In 1994, the Argentine Constitution recognised education as a fundamental human right, expanding the State’s responsibilities to guarantee free, quality education. However, it was with the National Education Law of 2006 (Law 26,206) that the Argentine education system was consolidated in its current form. This law extended compulsory schooling to the age of 13, including the initial level (from the age of 4), primary education, and secondary education. The National Education Law of 2006 also reinforced the decentralisation of education, granting greater autonomy to the provinces to manage their schools, although this has generated challenges related to regional equity (Ministerio de Educación, 2006b).
Today, the Argentine government continues to implement inclusion policies, such as the Conectar Igualdad Programme, which seeks to reduce the digital divide, along with efforts to combat school dropout rates at the secondary level (Ministerio de Justicia, 2002). Basic education in Argentina faces challenges, such as regional inequalities, insufficient funding in some provinces, and the need to adapt to contemporary technological demands.
National Education Act of 2006
The 2006 National Education Act was the result of a context of redemocratisation and the search for improvements in the quality of education following a period of political and social instability in Argentina. This historical context began after the end of the civil-military dictatorship (1976-1983), during which the country faced severe political repression, including media censorship, persecution of opponents, and systematic violations of human rights. With the re-establishment of democracy in 1983, Argentina faced the challenge of rebuilding its democratic institutions. In this context, education began to be regarded as a means of strengthening democracy.
During the 1990s, several reforms were implemented, focusing on expanding access to education, training teachers, and updating the curriculum. Of particular note was the 1993 National Education Act (Law 24.195), which established a decentralised model, transferring responsibility for basic education from federal authorities to the provinces. This allowed each province to adapt its educational policy to local needs, although it also generated inequalities between regions (República Argentina, 1993).
In 2005, the Education Financing Law was enacted, establishing that the Argentine State should progressively increase investments in education, science, and technology. Consequently, the Argentine State was to allocate 4.7% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2006, gradually increasing this to 6% by 2010 (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Educational Expenditure as a Percentage of GDP (2006-2010).
Source: República Argentina (2005).
In addition to setting investment targets in education, the National Education Law made secondary education compulsory for all students, covering an age range of 12 to 18 years. Furthermore, it sought to guarantee access to free and inclusive higher education, particularly in public universities, which have traditionally been the main means of access to higher education in Argentina.
Another important aspect introduced by the National Education Law was the implementation of Comprehensive Sexual Education (CSE). Sexual education was made compulsory for all schools across the country, from early childhood education to secondary school. The CSE curriculum was developed with the aim of providing a comprehensive education to students, addressing issues of sexuality with an emphasis on sexual diversity, human rights, sexual and reproductive health, and affective relationships.
When analysing the impact of the National Education Law on the development of secondary education for young people and adults, Olivares (2024) concluded that the approval of this law significantly enhanced the growth of secondary education for this demographic, which was already advancing across the country. The law provided a framework that enabled the implementation of new graduation programmes, such as the Plan for Completion of Primary and Secondary Education (FinEs), which achieved extensive national coverage.
Education in the Political-Economic Context
It is necessary to provide a brief political and economic context of Argentina throughout the 21st century, considering the impacts on education. The beginning of the century was marked by a political and economic crisis that started in 1998. In 2002, the crisis ended, but the previous year, then-President Fernando De La Rua was impeached. After this turbulent period, the 2000s were characterised by relatively strong economic growth, under the presidencies of Néstor and Cristina Kirchner. During Cristina Kirchner’s presidency (2007-2015), the government faced protests over tax increases, nationalized private pension funds, and dealt with inflation and capital flight. Despite a recession in 2009, the economy grew in 2010, and inflation remained high, reaching nearly 40% by 2014 (Romig, 2014). The expansion of public education was supported by this period of economic prosperity, allowing for increased investment in the sector.
Later, from 2015, with the government of Macri (2007-2015), Argentina faced an economic crisis characterised by high inflation, currency devaluation, and rising external debt. In December 2015, Macri lifted foreign exchange restrictions, leading to a 30% devaluation of the Peso and rising unemployment (Gannius, 2015). The government’s removal of export restrictions caused price hikes in staple goods, further straining the population. These economic challenges directly impacted government finances and the resources allocated to education.
During Alberto Fernández’s government (2019-2023), the economic crisis worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to significant financial strain. In 2019, inflation hit a 28-year high of 53.8%. The pandemic severely affected SMEs, with many unable to pay salaries and expenses, resulting in potential closures. By 2023, inflation exceeded 100%, further impacting public sector resources and the broader economy (Gozzi, 2023).
Milei Government and the Current Argentine Education Policies
Following Javier Milei’s election, significant budget cuts were made across various sectors, including a 52% reduction in education funding (Rivas Molina, Centenera, & Lorca, 2024). This is part of Milei’s proposed “Reforma Global de la Educación” (Global Education Reform), which aims to restructure the education system to align with his principles. The reform includes external evaluations for teachers and introduces national exams for high school completion. These changes are seen as a threat to teacher stability, autonomy, and the integrity of educational content, with private entities gaining increasing control (Marron, 2024).
Additional reforms include the promotion of hybrid learning, reduced regulation on teacher conditions, the reinstatement of university fees for foreign students, and diminishing university financial autonomy. Commercial advertisements in schools and restrictions on workers’ right to protest also form part of this package. These changes signal a shift towards a market-driven system, potentially excluding disadvantaged students from higher education. The reforms have faced resistance from unions, student groups, and education advocates who are fighting for a public and inclusive education system (Marron, 2024).
Conclusion
Argentina’s educational system has undergone significant transformations over the years, shaped by historical milestones such as Law 1420 and the National Education Law of 2006. These legal frameworks aimed to expand access to education, promote inclusivity, and address regional inequalities, while also responding to the challenges posed by political and economic instability. In particular, the 2006 law marked a pivotal moment by making secondary education compulsory and enhancing the focus on inclusivity, such as the introduction of Comprehensive Sexual Education. However, despite these advances, Argentina’s education system continues to grapple with persistent challenges, such as funding discrepancies, regional disparities, and the need for digital integration.
The recent policy changes under President Javier Milei, including significant budget cuts and reforms aimed at restructuring the education system, represent a sharp departure from the inclusive, state-driven approach of the past. These changes, which include the introduction of external evaluations, hybrid learning models, and a greater role for private entities, have been met with widespread resistance. Critics argue that these reforms could undermine the stability and autonomy of teachers, exacerbate inequalities, and further exclude disadvantaged students from higher education. As such, the ongoing debate surrounding these reforms highlights the tension between market-driven educational models and the push for a more equitable and public education system in Argentina.
References
Gannius, D. (2015). Retenciones: El costo fiscal de la quita dispuesta por Macri. El Destape Web. Retrieved from https://www.eldestapeweb.com/retenciones-el-costo-fiscal-la-quita-dispuesta-macri-n13174
Gozzi, L. (2023). Argentina inflation soars past 100% mark. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-64960385
Marron, L. (2024). How Milei’s measures affect education?. De La Calle. https://delacalle.org/como-afectan-a-la-educacion-las-medidas-de-milei/
Ministerio de Cultura. (2020). Ley 1420: piedra fundacional de la educación argentina. https://www.cultura.gob.ar/ley-1420-el-gran-avance-en-los-derechos-educativos-de-los-ninos-y-nina-10724/
Ministerio de Educación. (2006a). Ley de educación nacional. http://bnm.me.gov.ar/giga1/normas/5421.pdf
Ministerio de Educación. (2006b). Ley de educación nacional (Ley No. 26.206). . https://www.argentina.gob.ar/educacion/validez-titulos/glosario/ley26206
Ministerio de Justicia (2002). Conectar Igualdad. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/justicia/derechofacil/leysimple/educacion-ciencia-cultura/conectar-igualdad
República Argentina (1993) Ley 24.195 – Ley de educación nacional. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/nacional/ley-24195-17009/texto
República Argentina (2005) Ley de financiamiento educativo. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/normativa/nacional/ley-26075-112976/texto
Rivas Molina, F., Centenera, M. & Lorca, J. (2024). Milei, una motosierra que desguaza el Estado. El País. https://elpais.com/argentina/2024-10-13/milei-una-motosierra-que-desguaza-el-estado.html?utm
Romig, S. (2014). Argentina’s economy contracted, hurt by inflation. The Wall Street Journal.
Olivares, J. (2024). The impact of the National Education Law on the development of secondary education for young people and adults in Argentina. Revista IICE, (55). https://doi.org/10.34096/iice.n55.13289










