CASE OF TURAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY – a summary of the case

The case highlighted applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants – all of whom were sitting as judges or prosecutors at different types and/or levels of court.

Background to the case were as follows:

  1. During the night of 15 to 16 July 2016 a group of members of the Turkish armed forces calling themselves the “Peace at Home Council” attempted to carry out a military coup aimed at overthrowing the democratically installed National Assembly, government and President of Turkey.
  2. The day after the attempted military coup, the national authorities blamed the attempt on the network linked to Fetullah Gülen, a Turkish citizen living in Pennsylvania (United States of America) and considered to be the leader of FETÖ/PDY.


  1. On 16 July 2016 the Bureau for Crimes against the Constitutional Order at the Ankara public prosecutor’s office initiated a criminal investigation ex proprio motu into, inter alios, the suspected members of FETÖ/PDY within the judiciary. According to the information provided by the Government, this investigation against judges and prosecutors, including members of high courts, was initiated in accordance with the provisions of the ordinary law, on the ground that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto falling with the jurisdiction of the assize courts.



  1. instructions issued to the Directorate General of Security on the same day, the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor noted that the offence of attempting to overthrow the government and the constitutional order by force was still ongoing and that there was a risk that members of the FETÖ/PDY terrorist organisation who were suspected of committing the offence in question might flee the country. He asked the Directorate General of Security to contact all the regional authorities with a view to taking into police custody all the judges and public prosecutors whose names were listed in the appendix to the instructions – including some of the applicants –, and to ensure that they were brought before a public prosecutor to be placed in pre-trial detention under Article 309 of the Criminal Code.
  2. On 20 July 2016 the Government declared a state of emergency for a period of three months as from 21 July 2016; the state of emergency was subsequently extended for further periods of three months by the Council of Ministers.


  1. During the state of emergency, the Council of Ministers passed several legislative decrees under Article 121 of the Constitution (see Baş, cited above, § 52). One of them, Legislative Decree no. 667, published in the Official Gazette on 23 July 2016, provided in its Article 3 that the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors (Hakimler ve Savcılar Yüksek Kurulu ‑“the HSYK”) was authorised to dismiss any judges or prosecutors who were considered to belong or to be affiliated or linked to terrorist organisations or organisations, structures or groups found by the National Security Council to have engaged in activities harmful to national security.


  1. On 18 July 2018 the state of emergency was lifted.



Actions against judges/prosecutors by the Turkish state:

Laws under which the Turkish state took action:

The following laws were used to take action against the prosecutors / judges by the Turkish state.


Section 76

  1. The initial investigation in respect of offences committed by the President, the Chief Public Prosecutor, the deputy presidents, the chamber presidents and the members of the Supreme Administrative Court in connection with or in the course of their official duties shall be conducted by a committee composed of a chamber president and two members selected by the President of the Supreme Administrative Court.


The procedure for the prosecution of personal offences

Section 82

  1. The proceedings regarding the personal offences committed by the President, the Chief Public Prosecutor, the deputy presidents, the chamber presidents and the members of the Supreme Administrative Court shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions concerning the personal offences committed by the President, the Chief Public Prosecutor and the members of the Court of Cassation.


Outcome of the Judicial action by the Turkish state against prosecutors/ judges:

The Turkish state has taken judicial action against prosecutors/judges concerning the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants.


In the case Turan vs The State of Turkey the court noted the following:


  1. Decides, unanimously, to join the applications;
  2. Declares, unanimously, the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention concerning the lawfulness of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention admissible;
  3. Holds, unanimously, that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the unlawfulness of the initial pre-trial detention of the applicants who were ordinary judges and prosecutors at the time of their detention;
  4. Holds, unanimously, that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the unlawfulness of the initial pre-trial detention of the applicants who were members of the Court of Cassation or the Supreme Administrative Court at the time of their detention;
  5. Holds, by six votes to one, that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints under Article 5 of the Convention;
  6. Holds, unanimously,

(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and TURAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 29 expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on these amounts, which are to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

  1. Dismisses, unanimously, the remainder of the applicants’ claim for just satisfaction. Done in English, and notified in writing on 23 November 2021, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.


The state of judges/prosecutors in Turkey – a summary:


The actions by the Turkish state shows that its actions to initiate actions against Judges/prosecutors was arbitrary. This is why the court decided to impose fines on such actions. While, military coup is definitely hostile action against the executive, the arrest of judges and prosecutors were broad and arbitrary in its scope. Judges and Prosecutors are representatives of the critical third pillar of a country that is the Judiciary. Judiciary often acts as a check against overreach by the executive and legislature. In this way it ensures that people’s fundamental rights do not get trampled due to the actions of legislature/ executive whether knowingly/unknowingly.


The state of judges/ prosecutors in Turkey can be seen as vulnerable. The judges are vulnerable to actions by the Turkish state which believes in detention, arrest of judges without verifiable reason. This may be of significant concern because it leads to chilling stifling of judicial independence. The fundamental fact is that after the 2016 coup the arrest of prosecutors/ judges were based on suspicions of being a part of a movement that was allegedly responsible for a coup overthrowing the executive. While, overthrowing of a democratically elected government cannot be justified, the arrest of all judges who a part of a particular list shows a lack of respect for established forms. The Turkish government decided to ask the Directorate General of Security to contact all the regional authorities with a view to taking into police custody all the judges and public prosecutors whose names were listed in the appendix to the instructions – including some of the applicants –, and to ensure that they were brought before a public prosecutor to be placed in pre-trial detention under Article 309 of the Criminal Code. This is a complete violation of a proper process of prosecution in which there should have been investigation, enquiry, evidence gathering. After this there should have been arrest and then placing the evidence in court. None of this happened.


The Turkish authorities have shown complete lack of respect either for judges as individuals who have fundamental freedoms nor have they considered the impact it will have on the ability of judiciary to restrain harmful government action. In summary this is what the case and its verdict as well as Turkish govt’s actions highlight after a coup. While, coup against the state is unjustifiable detention of judges without proof of involvement in coup is also unjustifiable.


Retrieved from:

Broken Chalk is looking for Project-Reporting-Social Media Specialist, Web-Content Editor and Proof Reader as Intern and Volunteer

Who We Are

We, as Broken Chalk, aim to help people who face human rights violations across the globe in the educational field and aims to be the voice of those who face human rights violations at the scope of education in the World for them to overcome their challenges. What we do together with our international sponsors and partners is to encourage and support the following activities/projects:

  • Removing obstacles in education
  • Contributing to the achievement of peace and tranquility in the society through adaptation studies in an environment of intercultural tolerance
  • Preventing radicalism and polarization
  • Eliminating the opportunity gap in education in the context of young, old, women, men, and children

Our goal is to work together with global partners to remove barriers to education and take concrete steps to ensure universal access to education.

Due to COVID-19, Broken Chalk, almost all works online. We prioritize the safety of our volunteers.

Available openings:

  1. Project Specialist (Internship)
  2. Reporting Specialist (Volunteer)
  3. Web-Content Editor (Volunteer)
  4. Proof Reader (English) (Volunteer)
  5. Social Media Specialist (Volunteer)

Broken Chalk is seeking Interns

1. Project Specialist (Internship)

The role will emphasize the project proposal writing for EU calls.

Job description

The tasks consist of:

  • Writing proposals for EU programs, i.e. (CERV, AMIF, etc.)
  • Organizing and implementing EU programs
  • Supporting research activities in a general sense;
  • Assist in the organization of (online) discussions and meetings.

Required Skills

We want to meet you if the following job requirements are met:

  • Good research and writing skills;
  • Excellent command of the English language (written & verbal)
  • Excellent communication & organizational skills;
  • Ability to work effectively as part of a team;
  • Highly self-motivated and methodical, paying attention to detail;
  • Ability to work under pressure and meet strict deadlines;
  • Being in the final phase of a relevant field of study;
  • Proactive attitude and flexibility.

Broken Chalk is seeking volunteers.

2. Reporting Specialist (Volunteer)

The role will emphasize fundraising, acknowledgment letter writing, prospect research, and donor engagement. Ideally, the candidate will be available for 15 to 32 hours per week for at least six months.

Job description

The volunteer will learn and be exposed to:

  • Conducting prospect research;
  • Cultivating donor relations;
  • Drafting documents and other correspondence related to donor outreach;
  • Creating promotional materials and mailings;
  • Using fundraising and donor databases;
  • Proofreading solicitations and proposals;
  • General research on our programmatic work to assist colleagues in preparing for briefings.
  • Preparing reports on the Human Rights Violations related issues;
  • Writing an article on the current Human Rights Violations in the World.
  • Doing interviews with human rights defenders who are prominent in their society.

Required Skills

Qualifications: Applicants should be well-organized, self-motivated, and reliable, with a strong interest in international human rights. Relevant coursework is highly desirable, and knowledge of Computer skills (i.e., Microsoft Office, Internet applications) are required. Proficiency with Microsoft word would also be beneficial.  The level of English should be professional, and knowing Dutch or any other language is a plus.

3. Web-Content Editor (Volunteer)

Job description

The tasks consist of:

  • producing new content and writing it in an exciting and appealing manner
  • sourcing images and artwork, and commissioning photographers
  • liaising with clients or internal departments
  • maintaining the site once it is life and ensuring the information is accurate

Required Skills

  • have excellent communication skills, both written and oral
  • be able to undertake research using a variety of sources
  • be creative, able to alter their style of writing to reflect their audience
  • be computer literate and possess good keyboard skills
  • be interested in different methods of communication
  • be able to work on websites which are based on Word Press

4. Proof Reader (English) (Volunteer)

Job description

The tasks consist of:

  • Read and evaluate written text for grammatical and typographical error
  • Liaise with writers and editors to determine the composition of specific texts in a document
  • Compare typeset proofs against original copy to identify the mistakes or omission
  • Analyze documents to ensure chapter titles match the list of contents
  • Use symbols that are standard and recognized by printing and publishing companies
  • Rephrase written text to ensure document structure and content are consistent
  • Contact authors directly to clarify grammatical inconsistencies related to style and text choice
  • Forward proofread materials for approval and publication

Required Skills

  • Bachelor’s degree is most preferably in English, journalism, mass communication, or related fields.

5. Social Media Specialist (Volunteer)

Job description

  • Manages Broken Chalk’s social media accounts and posts content.
  • Brainstorms campaign ideas.
  • Monitor various social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.

Required Skills

  • Knowledge of Social media such as Linkedin, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
  • Online engagement
  • Verbal communication
  • Organization
  • Customer focus

How to Apply: 

Email your

  • CV/resume
  • letter of interest

to [email protected]

or Easy Apply through Linkedin Link

Only complete applications will be reviewed.

Broken Chalk is diverse. We do not discriminate in hiring practices and actively seek a diverse applicant pool. We encourage candidates of all abilities, ages, gender identities and expressions, national origins, races and ethnicities, religious beliefs, sexual orientations, and those with criminal records to apply. We welcome all kinds of diversity. Broken Chalk is an equal opportunity employer.

Do you want to have Broken Chalk as a Platform in your homeland?

Broken Chalk started his journey as a platform in the Netherlands. Broken Chalk is now much more than a platform and we have reviewed and enlarged our vision and mission within this framework. Violations of rights would be the first on our agenda in the field of Education all over the World. At the point we reached today, Broken Chalk opened its door to all individuals from all across the globe, from all professions, and to all individuals who say or can say ‘I also want to stand against violations of human rights in Education for our future and whole humanity, where our generations grow up together.’


If you believe that your country needs such activities. You can start your own Broken Chalk community as a platform in your homeland. We are ready to cooperate with you and share all our experiences, documentations, and network with you.


If you are interested fill the following form and attached your CV and letter of motivation.


    Letter of Motivation

    Your CV