World Children: Risk Factors Associated With Mental Health

Unicef recently published a report with the title “The State of the World’s Children 2021”

“The COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about the mental health of a generation of children. But the pandemic may represent the tip of a mental health iceberg we’ve long overlooked. State of the World’s Children 2021 examines child, adolescent, and caregiver mental health. It focuses on risks and protective factors at critical moments in the life course and explores the social determinants that shape mental health and well-being.

It calls for commitment, communication, and action as part of a comprehensive approach to promoting good mental health for every child, protecting vulnerable children, and caring for the children facing their greatest challenges.” 1

 

Here you will get the summary of Chapter 4, “The Worl at Large” Section

Part 1: POVERTY

Poverty is not just about a lack of money – it is multidimensional, involving deprivations in education, health, food, water, and sanitation. The relationship between poverty and mental health can be a two-way street: Poverty can lead to mental health conditions, and mental health conditions can lead to poverty.

The stress of poverty can interfere with caregivers’ capacity to consistently provide positive parenting, as one of the primary effects. Time also matters. The longer a child lives in poverty, the greater the risks to mental health. Poverty can also have a profound psychological impact on children’s and adolescents’ capacity to seek opportunities and realize their dreams. It also affects long-term decision-making, depriving young people’s attention to their immediate needs.

The main elements of poverty, access to opportunity, and income inequality can also impact mental health and behavior. The most common association is between income inequality and depression, as income inequality erodes social trust and social interactions.

Poverty and mental health demand complex and multisectoral responses that protect and promote good mental health. Cash transfer programmers, for example, have shown promising results for educational attainment, use of health-care services, food security, and child labor.

Part 2: DISCRIMINATION

Recognizing the intersectionality of different kinds of discrimination can help highlight interlocking disadvantages that affect the experience of discrimination and mental health.

Gender – Discrimination based on gender can define roles and responsibilities that limit opportunity, restrict behavior, and constrain expectations and self-expression – all of which can affect mental health and, in most societies, puts girls at a disadvantage. Boys also face restrictive gender roles. Harmful concepts of masculinity can hamper boys’ ability to express emotions or seek support.

Race – In general, racism exposes children and young people to discrimination, disadvantage, prejudice, stereotyping, microaggressions, and social exclusion based on race or ethnicity. Experiences of racism can cause a ripple effect through families and communities, transmitting trauma from caregiver to child. The bottom line is this: Tackling racism and the roots of discrimination is essential to safeguarding mental health for many children and young people.

Disability – Far too often, children and young people with disabilities face discrimination based on multiple and intersecting identities. They are often victims of pervasive practices such as segregation from other children and young people, over-medicalization, and institutionalization. Addressing these forms of discrimination demands a human rights model that recognizes the complexity of intersecting forms of discrimination and considers the child’s best interest.

LGBTQ+ – A meta-analysis of mental health for LGBTQ+ young people showed elevated suicide attempts, anxiety, and depression rates. Young people who identify as non-binary can experience worse mental health outcomes, less social support, and a greater risk of abuse and victimization. Especially males are at greater risk of school-based victimization, which affects development.

Indigenous groups– Indigenous groups worldwide also face discrimination-based risks to mental health, facing racism, disparities, etc. A 2018 systematic review of studies from 30 countries and territories found that many indigenous adult populations have elevated rates of suicide compared to non-indigenous people.

Part 3: HUMANITARIAN CRISIS

The impact of the humanitarian crisis on children’s and young people’s mental health involves a complex mix of risks. Crisis can mean that school is disrupted, poverty, others move in, and children are orphaned or separated from primary caregivers. The specific characteristics of experiences with a crisis can have different consequences, as incidents can accumulate. The result is a dose-effect: the greater the exposure, the greater the risk to mental health.

 

 

MENTAL HEALTH AND MIGRANT CHILDREN

Surveyed migrants described the dissolution of community and family support networks during transit, disruptions to their education, persistent feelings of limited autonomy, and a lack of viable future career options. The migration experience can cause severe stress, anxiety, and trauma at critical moments of child development. However, children’s and young people’s narratives also show their resilience and a sense of purpose as they pursue aspirations for a better future through migration.

 

 

Part 4: THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND MENTAL HEALTH

Globally, at least one in seven children has been directly affected by lockdowns. Children and adolescents who faced the most significant mental health risks came from disadvantaged families, had pre-existing mental health conditions, or had a history of adverse childhood experiences. There was a difference in response: girls were at greater risk of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and behavior issues, and boys were at greater risk of substance abuse. Overall, the review indicates that the pandemic did fuel some increases in depression, although, in most studies, these symptoms were only mild to moderate.

Less noticed is that the pandemic may have improved life satisfaction for some children and families by relieving them of school pressure or allowing them to spend more time together.

To conclude, the COVID effects include:

  • Stress and anxiety;
  • Depression and suicidal behavior
  • Behavior problems
  • Alcohol and substance use
  • Lifestyle changes
  • Positive mental health

Part 5: DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
Digital technologies and mental health

The COVID-19 pandemic brought home, as never before, the digital technologies for a vivid connection with school or entertainment purposes. For many other families, the absence of digital access was never more acutely felt. However, there is a concern about digital technologies among parents and young people. How justified are these concerns? Two key issues, social media and screen time, can help illustrate some of the broader themes in this research.

Overall, there is now a substantial body of research indicating only a minimal association between social media use and mental health, including depression, anxiety, and well-being. There is only limited evidence of a strong association between poor mental health outcomes with screen time. As more of the world becomes digitally connected in the years to come, it’s hard to disentangle offline experiences from those online.

In the focus group discussions directed by JHU, participants described how digital technology was both helpful and harmful to well-being. The main arguments include the impact of social media on self-esteem, cyber-violence, the damaging effect of receiving hurtful comments, and how digital technology helped their mental health.

Digital technology for mental health

Digital technology can be used in capacity-building. Among the promising digital interventions in use is EMPOWER, a digital training platform that uses digital technology to train and provide real-time guidance for community health workers, including nurses, social workers, and midwives.

In addition, digital technology is also being used to provide treatment. For example, computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (c-CBT) can moderately effectively treat depression and anxiety in young people aged 10–24, particularly when coupled with in-person components to encourage adherence.


CLIMATE CHANGE AND MENTAL HEALTH

Climate change will profoundly impact young people’s futures. Extreme weather events such as floods and heatwaves raise food insecurity, water insecurity, and conflicts. In essence, these dangers expose young people to significantly stressful experiences. But will their mental health be affected?

Part 6: RESILIENCE

What makes a child or young person resilient in the face of adversity? Evidence shows that resilience is fundamental to mental health. In a cross-cultural study of strength published in 2007, Michael Ungar and colleagues interviewed 89 young people at 14 sites in 11 countries. They concluded that stability requires the ability to navigate seven tensions:

  1. Access to material resources
  2. Healthy relationships
  3. Identity
  4. Power and control
  5. Cultural adherence
  6. Social justice
  7. Cohesion

Evidence has shown that multiple factors combine to bolster resilience and mental health:

  • On cultivating resilience, some themes point to critical elements for action include:
  • The importance of supporting the needs and well-being of parents and caregivers
  • Adopt a multisystem, multidisciplinary approach to equitably providing services that bolster resilience
  • Understand and tailor interventions to multiple diverse contexts
  • Support schools as protective, inclusive environments for child learning and development

Part 7: THE FACE OF ILL-TREATMENT

Children and young people are deprived of their human rights and subjected to detention and treatment that, in many cases, can undermine their mental health or aggravate an existing condition. Mental distress in such settings may be interpreted as a reflection of underlying mental health issues, although it can often respond to ill-treatment itself. Of particular concern for mental health are the care institutions. There are multiple reports of abuse of children in institutions. There is also extensive evidence of ill-treatment in homes, prayer camps, and religious institutions.

Furthermore, far too often, mental health services perpetuate stereotypes of people with mental ill-health as dangerous. But, people with psychosocial disabilities are much more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators.


WHAT CAN BE DONE?

Mental health legislation based on the rights of individuals with mental health conditions is essential. Children and young people with mental health conditions must not only be treated as patients but as individuals with rights, individuals who, under their evolving capacities, can play an active role in their care through direct or supported decision-making. In addition, communication, advocacy, and collaboration are required with community leaders, including faith healers.

 

By Xhina Çekani

 

 

Tips on Horizon Europe Programme’s Standard Application Form

Horizon Europe Programme serves as the fundamental funding Programme with the objective of Research and Innovation at its core, facilitating EU’s overall impact and progression. The following article provides an overview of its Application Form (Part A) and Technical description (Part B).

A. Application Form. (Information added in this area is done via a submission system portal and can be edited at any point in time before the final submission)

1. General Information:

> To be filled only by the project coordinator’s contact information. All participants can view it.

> ABSTRACT must be clear, concise, and relevant. The cost and time frame to achieve proposal objectives should be realistic and adequately communicated.

> DECLARATIONS contain terms and conditions of the proposal and are mandatory to fill. (False statements may lead to EU financial regulation penalties.)

2. list of all participants:

> Here, the initiator of the proposal is the chief or ‘main contact person’ for services, having full access rights to edit and upload proposal attachments.

> The ‘Coordinator contact’ has full access to edit and upload attachments.

> All other ‘participant contacts’ have read-only rights. If and when granted full access rights, they can only edit their section of the administrative form.

ORGANIZATION DATA reveals all relevant information about the participating organization.

RESEARCHERS involved in the proposal follow a hierarchy from top researcher to first stage researcher as defined in the Frascati 2015 manual.

After highlighting the role of the participating organization in the project, the proposal must include five relevant publications, alongside five relevant projects carried out recently.

Following this, all relevant technical material required to execute the proposed work must also be highlighted.

The proposal must also include a coherent Gender Equality Plan (GEP) ensuring the protection of gender identities and the promotion of gender integration.

3. Budget of the proposal: All potential inflows and outflows must thoroughly be calculated to ensure optimal cost-effectiveness.

4. Ethics and Security: Environmental health hazards, breach of personal data, exploitation of human life, non-compliance with regulatory laws, and misuse of power must all be kept in mind before proceeding with the proposal.

5. Other Questions: The two-stage calls must ensure that there are no discrepancies in the information shared in stage 1 and stage 2 of the project proposal.

B. Technical description- Highlights the scope of the project (Information must be shared as a PDF document, the template of which is to be downloaded directly from within the submission system. Any edits or updates must be done manually as a revised PDF document before final submission.)

The PROPOSAL TEMPLATE (Page 3 of 23 part B) shares all structural and formatting details pertaining to the document, followed by a detailed DESCRIPTION of the breakdown of the proposal narrative consisting of: Critical Risk, Deliverables, Impacts, Milestones, objectives, outcomes, the pathway to impact, Research output, results, and technology readiness level.

The TITLE OF THE PROPOSAL is followed by a list of participants.

Following this, the 1. Excellence highlights areas that fall within and outside the scope of the project.

1.1. Objectives and ambitions take into account the realisticness of the project.

1.2. Methodology highlights the tools and techniques chosen to meet the project’s objectives. They must be in compliance with Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 2020/852, and must uphold the six environmental objectives of the EU Taxonomy Regulation.

2. Impact: An in-depth assessment of the potential and anticipated impact of the project’s objectives, the credibility of the pathways to achieve them, and maximizing outcomes.

2.1 Project’s pathways towards impact: Effects of long-term project results.

2.2 Measures to maximize the impact

2.3 Impact Summary (Target groups, Outcomes, Impact)

>Specific needs: Reasons that led to a need for reform.

> Expected results: Did the project successfully cater to the issues it was initially designed to target?

> D & E & C measures: Evaluating wider socio-economic results of the project via dissemination, exploitation, and communication methods.

3. Quality and efficiency of the implementation: Risk assessment and effectiveness of the work plan.

3.1 Work plan and resources

3.2 Capacity of participants and consortium as a whole: Bringing together experts from all fields to reach conclusive and valid findings.

This report of the Horizon Europe Programme concludes with the STANDARD MODULAR EXTENSION OF PROPOSAL TEMPLATE, where issues of additional financial support and requirement of additional information are raised, as and when required.

 

FORMAT

Page limit: The title, list of participants, and sections 1, 2, and 3, together, should not be longer than 45 pages. All tables, figures, references and any other element pertaining to these sections must be included as an integral part of these sections and are thus counted against this page limit. The number of pages included in each section of this template is only indicative. Evaluated in the way they were submitted so ALL REQUIRED ASPECTS have to be addressed

The page limit will be applied automatically. At the end of this document you can see the structure of the actual proposal that you need to submit, please remove all instruction pages that are watermarked.

The page limit is not a target. It is in your interest to keep your text as concise as possible since experts rarely view unnecessarily long proposals in a positive light.

 

Formatting:

The reference font for the body text of proposals is Times New Roman (Windows platforms), Times/Times New Roman (Apple platforms), or Nimbus Roman No. 9 L (Linux distributions).

The use of a different font for the body text is not advised and is subject to the cumulative conditions that the font is legible and that its use does not significantly shorten the representation of the proposal in a number of pages compared to using the reference font (for example with a view to bypass the page limit).

The minimum font size allowed is 11 points. Standard character spacing and a minimum of single line spacing are to be used. This applies to the body text, including text in tables.

Text elements other than the body text, such as headers, foot/endnotes, captions, formulas, may deviate but must be legible.

The page size is A4, and all margins (top, bottom, left, right) should be at least 15 mm (not including any footers or headers).

 

By Mahnoor Tariq & Elizaveta Rusakova

How to fill Horizon Europe Programme Standard Application Form

Main components and highlights

The application form is composed of Part A, and Part B. Part A provides the general information on the project and its partners, and Part B is the narrative of the complete project proposal. Part A and Part B of the Application form are also divided into sections, one of them providing information on a different aspect of the project. Below are listed all the project proposal requirements, as per each part and section.

Part A:

It is based on the information entered by the participants through the submission system in the Funding & Tenders Portal.

Section 1General information

This section includes the general information of the project at the beginning, such as title, acronym, duration, and keywords. The abstract will be provided in this part, as well as Mandatory Declarations will be filled in this section. It can be completed only by contact with the project coordinator.

Section 2-  Participants

This section provides the list of participating organizations, as registered or validated in the central registry of organizations of the European Commission, linked to the given PIC number. In this section will be completed the information for the coordinator, including address, Departments carrying out the proposed work, Main contact person, Researchers involved in the proposal (together with their career stage, identifier, and Role), Role of the organization in the project, five publications, five previous relevant projects, Significant infrastructure and if a gender management plan will be taken into account.

Section 3 – Budget of the proposals

Section 3 indicates the project’s costs, where each participant’s estimated eligible costs are foreseen. The eligible costs for each participant can be covered by Eu contribution, income generated by the action, or other recourses that should be specified in the budget table. The estimated reasonable prices include personnel, purchases, subcontracting, and other expenses.

Section 4 – Ethics and Security

The ethics and security section includes a table of ethics issues and another table of security issues that do or do not concern our proposal. At the end of both tables, in case of any specific problems concerns our proposal, additional information should be provided in a special section.

Section 5 – Other questions

This section is designed for the 2-stage applications and should be completed in case of a substantial difference between the stage 1 and stage 2 project proposal, considering differences in budget, approach and partnership composition.

Part B

Section 1 – Excellence

In this first sub-section, the objectives and ambitions of the proposed work should be described. Objectives should be in line with the program topic, as well as measurable and verifiable.

  • The 1.2 sub-section within the Excellence includes the description of the Methodology. The Methodology should include the approach, as well as the detailed tasks and work packages under ‘Implementation’. It should consider previews researches, methods of different disciplines to be in use of our approach, reusability of data, data management.

Section 2 – Impact

This section is dedicated to designing the pathways to achieve the expected outcomes and impacts specified in the work program as well as their measurement.

2.1       In the first sub-section, the outcomes should be described. At the same time, the wider impacts, in the longer term, should also be included. In this part, any potential risk should be taken into account.

2.2       Measures to maximize impact – Dissemination, exploitation, and communication –
The planned measures to maximize the impact of the project by providing a first version of the ‘plan for the dissemination and exploitation including communication activities should be described. Intellectual property rights should be considered during communication.

2.3       A summary of the section should be as well provided through the canvas, that makes a connection of the project’s needs, expected results, and measures to be taken for results achievement. In addition, there is a canvas dedicated to the logical framework that connects Target groups, outcomes, and Impact.

 

Section 3 – Quality and efficiency of the implementation

3.1  The sub-section of the third section, is dedicated to the detailed project’s activities plans. There will be provided information on the brief overall structure of the work plan; timing of the different work packages, graphical presentation of the components, a list of work packages, a description of each work package and deliverables, staff effort.

The description should be detailed, including mistletoes and risks.

This part as well should cover a justification description for the costs of the activities, that fall under “subcontracting” and “other costs” categories.

3.2  In this part, the description of the consortium should be provided. How does it match the project’s objectives, and bring together the necessary disciplinary and inter-disciplinary knowledge?

 

By Xhina Çekani

The cover photo is taken from: https://euronovia-conseil.eu/en/template-differences-h2020-horizon-europe/

Why teachers’ pay matter?

It’s been a year and a half since education in schools and universities worldwide have shifted from on-site learning to distance learning due to the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic. This change in education style has created a new challenge for teachers and increased their burden with the extra workload as they have to adapt to the recent shift in education style, as well as constantly change their education mode to ensure that students get the best education quality, and keep them motivated.[1]

 

 

A new report from OECD’s Education At A Glance 2021 shows that teachers’ salaries vary hugely in different countries. Generally, teachers’ salaries increase with the level of education they teach and the years of experience. Still, the OECD report showed a shocking fact: teachers in OECD countries, on average,  earn 81-96% of the salaries of tertiary-educated workers, as the highest salary is paid in Luxemburg (around $109,000 and more) and the lowest is paid in Slovak Republic, Latvia, Hungary, Costa Rica, and Brazil (around $19,000).

 

 

Now here comes the question: Why does teachers’ pay matter? UN’s fourth Sustainable Development Goal and OECD’s Education At A Glance 2021 report shows the strong relationship between high salary and providing the best/high quality of education, as this leads to “close learning gaps and ensure every child has access to a quality education.”

 

The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2020 predicts that by 2025, 85 million jobs may be displaced. The new division of labour between humans, machines, and algorithms may emerge – and this is where key ‘human’ soft skills like problem-solving will be critical, as teachers will play a huge role in promoting these new skills.

 

[1] Retrieved on 27th of December 2021, from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/10/teachers-pay-countries-salaries-education/

By Zinat Asadova

Does Covid-19 affect teachers’ mental health?

According to The World Economic Forum, the Covid-19 pandemic has affected a disproportionate weight on teachers. The article sheds light on, not only the health risk that was imposed on teachers to keep teaching in the midst of the pandemic; but also on the detrimental effects of their mental health. In fact, 80% of teachers have declared to have known an impact on their mental health, due to the pandemic. Additionally, the transition to online teaching was expected to be made swiftly, without the understanding of the challenges this implied on teachers.


Certainly, this information would convert into adequate financial compensation, so as to match the personal cost as well as reflect the importance of the profession itself. Such a time has made clear our reliance, both as systems and individuals, on teachers. In addition, a higher salary and improved working conditions will likely attract higher-quality teachers, positively influencing students’ learning.


However, this article spells out the clear variation between lower secondary teachers’ starting salaries across OECD countries in 2021. Specifically, we find the most distinct gap between Luxembourg that is close to $80k, and Brazil that is around $15K per year. It is upon this understanding that UN agencies (UNESCO, UNICEF, and the International Labour Organisation) have requested increased compensation for teachers on World Teachers’ Day, 5 October 2021

 

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/10/teachers-pay-countries-salaries-education/

By Maya Shaw

 

The cover photo is taken from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/parenting-education/more-than-80-of-teachers-say-the-pandemic-has-hurt-their-mental-health

Table is taken from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/b35a14e5-en.pdf?expires=1640638137&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=95C1B13D56ADDB9B52D8C95B00B94F47

Are the OECD countries paying the teachers fairly?

Tackling education challenges and addressing SDG 4 by ensuring quality education for every child is a multidimensional process. Ensuring fair pay for teachers is an essential part of it. “Compensation and working conditions are important for attracting, developing, and retaining skilled and high-quality teachers and school heads,” says the OECD Education At A Glance 2021 report. This need has intensified, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic: teachers are carrying a new burden of extra workload related to constantly changing teaching modes and keeping students motivated in the hard times.

 

OECD report analyses teachers’ salaries in OECD countries. The earnings variance is shocking: with the highest average salary of $109,000 (1) in Luxembourg and the lowest one with around $19,000 (1) in the Slovak Republic, Latvia, Hungary, Costa Rica, and Brazil. Even though payment increases with years of experience and school level taught, teachers in OECD countries still earn 81-96% of the salaries of tertiary-educated workers on average. Fair payment for teachers is also essential in changes in the labor market. With a displacement of workplaces, priority will continue to be given to key “human” soft skills like problem-solving, and teachers will play a key role in promoting these skills.

  • The numbers provided are for lower secondary level teachers with more than 15 years of experience.

Reference: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/10/teachers-pay-countries-salaries-education/

By Elizaveta Rusakova

CASE OF TURAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY – a summary of the case

The case highlighted applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants – all of whom were sitting as judges or prosecutors at different types and/or levels of court.

Background to the case were as follows:

  1. During the night of 15 to 16 July 2016 a group of members of the Turkish armed forces calling themselves the “Peace at Home Council” attempted to carry out a military coup aimed at overthrowing the democratically installed National Assembly, government and President of Turkey.
  2. The day after the attempted military coup, the national authorities blamed the attempt on the network linked to Fetullah Gülen, a Turkish citizen living in Pennsylvania (United States of America) and considered to be the leader of FETÖ/PDY.

 

  1. On 16 July 2016 the Bureau for Crimes against the Constitutional Order at the Ankara public prosecutor’s office initiated a criminal investigation ex proprio motu into, inter alios, the suspected members of FETÖ/PDY within the judiciary. According to the information provided by the Government, this investigation against judges and prosecutors, including members of high courts, was initiated in accordance with the provisions of the ordinary law, on the ground that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto falling with the jurisdiction of the assize courts.

 

 

  1. instructions issued to the Directorate General of Security on the same day, the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor noted that the offence of attempting to overthrow the government and the constitutional order by force was still ongoing and that there was a risk that members of the FETÖ/PDY terrorist organisation who were suspected of committing the offence in question might flee the country. He asked the Directorate General of Security to contact all the regional authorities with a view to taking into police custody all the judges and public prosecutors whose names were listed in the appendix to the instructions – including some of the applicants –, and to ensure that they were brought before a public prosecutor to be placed in pre-trial detention under Article 309 of the Criminal Code.
  2. On 20 July 2016 the Government declared a state of emergency for a period of three months as from 21 July 2016; the state of emergency was subsequently extended for further periods of three months by the Council of Ministers.

 

  1. During the state of emergency, the Council of Ministers passed several legislative decrees under Article 121 of the Constitution (see Baş, cited above, § 52). One of them, Legislative Decree no. 667, published in the Official Gazette on 23 July 2016, provided in its Article 3 that the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors (Hakimler ve Savcılar Yüksek Kurulu ‑“the HSYK”) was authorised to dismiss any judges or prosecutors who were considered to belong or to be affiliated or linked to terrorist organisations or organisations, structures or groups found by the National Security Council to have engaged in activities harmful to national security.

 

  1. On 18 July 2018 the state of emergency was lifted.

 

 

Actions against judges/prosecutors by the Turkish state:

Laws under which the Turkish state took action:

The following laws were used to take action against the prosecutors / judges by the Turkish state.

Investigation

Section 76

  1. The initial investigation in respect of offences committed by the President, the Chief Public Prosecutor, the deputy presidents, the chamber presidents and the members of the Supreme Administrative Court in connection with or in the course of their official duties shall be conducted by a committee composed of a chamber president and two members selected by the President of the Supreme Administrative Court.

 

The procedure for the prosecution of personal offences

Section 82

  1. The proceedings regarding the personal offences committed by the President, the Chief Public Prosecutor, the deputy presidents, the chamber presidents and the members of the Supreme Administrative Court shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions concerning the personal offences committed by the President, the Chief Public Prosecutor and the members of the Court of Cassation.

 

Outcome of the Judicial action by the Turkish state against prosecutors/ judges:

The Turkish state has taken judicial action against prosecutors/judges concerning the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants.

 

In the case Turan vs The State of Turkey the court noted the following:

 

  1. Decides, unanimously, to join the applications;
  2. Declares, unanimously, the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention concerning the lawfulness of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention admissible;
  3. Holds, unanimously, that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the unlawfulness of the initial pre-trial detention of the applicants who were ordinary judges and prosecutors at the time of their detention;
  4. Holds, unanimously, that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the unlawfulness of the initial pre-trial detention of the applicants who were members of the Court of Cassation or the Supreme Administrative Court at the time of their detention;
  5. Holds, by six votes to one, that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints under Article 5 of the Convention;
  6. Holds, unanimously,

(a) that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and TURAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 29 expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on these amounts, which are to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

  1. Dismisses, unanimously, the remainder of the applicants’ claim for just satisfaction. Done in English, and notified in writing on 23 November 2021, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 

The state of judges/prosecutors in Turkey – a summary:

 

The actions by the Turkish state shows that its actions to initiate actions against Judges/prosecutors was arbitrary. This is why the court decided to impose fines on such actions. While, military coup is definitely hostile action against the executive, the arrest of judges and prosecutors were broad and arbitrary in its scope. Judges and Prosecutors are representatives of the critical third pillar of a country that is the Judiciary. Judiciary often acts as a check against overreach by the executive and legislature. In this way it ensures that people’s fundamental rights do not get trampled due to the actions of legislature/ executive whether knowingly/unknowingly.

 

The state of judges/ prosecutors in Turkey can be seen as vulnerable. The judges are vulnerable to actions by the Turkish state which believes in detention, arrest of judges without verifiable reason. This may be of significant concern because it leads to chilling stifling of judicial independence. The fundamental fact is that after the 2016 coup the arrest of prosecutors/ judges were based on suspicions of being a part of a movement that was allegedly responsible for a coup overthrowing the executive. While, overthrowing of a democratically elected government cannot be justified, the arrest of all judges who a part of a particular list shows a lack of respect for established forms. The Turkish government decided to ask the Directorate General of Security to contact all the regional authorities with a view to taking into police custody all the judges and public prosecutors whose names were listed in the appendix to the instructions – including some of the applicants –, and to ensure that they were brought before a public prosecutor to be placed in pre-trial detention under Article 309 of the Criminal Code. This is a complete violation of a proper process of prosecution in which there should have been investigation, enquiry, evidence gathering. After this there should have been arrest and then placing the evidence in court. None of this happened.

 

The Turkish authorities have shown complete lack of respect either for judges as individuals who have fundamental freedoms nor have they considered the impact it will have on the ability of judiciary to restrain harmful government action. In summary this is what the case and its verdict as well as Turkish govt’s actions highlight after a coup. While, coup against the state is unjustifiable detention of judges without proof of involvement in coup is also unjustifiable.

 

Retrieved from:

Report from the Children’s Commissioners of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (UK) to the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child

This report published in December 2020 aims to inform the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child about the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in the UK and identify emerging trends and critical issues about children’s rights. The following article gathers the most significant findings of the Commissioners.

 

  • Incorporation of the UNCRC into domestic law and failure to ratify the third Optional Protocol

The commissioners report that the UK ratified the UNCRC in 1991 but has not been incorporated into domestic legislation and remains nonjusticiable in UK courts. In addition, the UK did not confirm the Optional Protocol to the UNCRC. In England and Northern Ireland, there is no legal requirement for government ministers to have due regard to the UNCRC, and no unusual movement has been made to introduce the UNCRC into domestic law. However, the commissioners welcome the Scottish initiative to incorporate the UNCRC into Scottish law.

  • Children’s rights and interests not prioritized in decision-making

The commissioners noted the lack of consideration for children’s rights or voices in policy or legislative processes in the UK. Specifically, the quality of the Child Rights Impact Assessments (CRIA) is concerning, often with no analysis of available options, no justification of selected options, no mitigation measures, and their impact on ministerial decisions is nuclear.

  • Inadequate resource allocation and no transparency in budgeting

Across the UK, there is a lack of transparency and clarity in budget processes, allocations, and expenditures concerning children, making it challenging to identify how much funding is allocated to children. The budget is also insufficient. For instance, Before the pandemic, children’s statutory services in England faced a £3 billion18 shortfall.19 Meeting the needs of all children in vulnerable situations would cost approximately £10 billion

  • Insufficient data collection, disaggregation, and análisis

There is a lack of coherent, consistent, transparent, and systematic, disaggregated data collection concerning children across all jurisdictions, making it difficult to monitor and measure children’s needs and assess the fulfillment of their rights.

  • Insufficient protection means children continue to experience discrimination.

In some areas of Scots law, a ‘child’ is defined as someone under 16, which means some child protection and mental health safeguards do not apply to 16- and 17-year-olds in some settings. For instance, in Northern Ireland, the Age Discrimination Bill would apply only to persons over 16. In England, Black Caribbean pupils are three times as likely to be permanently excluded than White British pupils and twice as likely to receive a fixed period exclusion than White British pupils.

  • Inadequate participation of children and young people in decision-making

Children’s right to be heard and involved in decision-making processes across all jurisdictions is denied without comprehensive implementation in law and practice. The voting age for UK general elections remains 18. It should be lowered to 16.

  • Violence against children

Across the UK, isolation, seclusion, and restraint58 are used in education, care, mental health, and detention settings, sometimes as a disciplinary measure for low-level incidents and sometimes resulting in injuries. In England, restraint in education settings and Young Offenders Institutions (YOIs) is permitted to maintain good order and discipline. In Scotland, restraint is sometimes used as an inappropriate response to distressed children’s behavior. Local authority policies and practices are inconsistent, failing to recognize children’s rights. In addition, In England and Northern Ireland, the reasonable punishment defense for assaulting children still exists in law.

Regarding sexual abuse, In England, most children who experience sexual abuse are not identified or supported, and the investigative process, including significant delays in bringing cases to trial, is often traumatic. In Northern Ireland, the average of 986 days for sexual offenses cases involving child victims to reach completion is concerning.

Regarding children enrolled in armed forces, the UK continues to enlist children in the Armed Forces from 16 and actively recruits 16- and 17-year-olds despite the Committee’s recommendations. In Northern Ireland, paramilitary intimidation, shootings, and attacks continue to be perpetrated on children, causing casualties, injuries, and many to become homeless.

  • Family environment and alternative care

In England, total spending on children’s services decreased in real terms by approximately 11% from 2009/10-2017/18, with assistance, including youth services and children’s centers, experiencing a 60% decrease by 2019/20. In addition, A lack of appropriate services, including specialist residential provision, in or near the place of residence, means children from England and Wales are placed in unregulated placements or sent far from home.

  • Disability, essential health, and welfare

Across the UK, disabled children are disproportionately affected by inadequate resourcing, mainly because of austerity measures and Covid-19. Overall, disabled children do not always have the additional support required by law or equal Access to services. In England, Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) services are under increasing pressure. In 2017/18, 81.3% of local authorities overspent their high-needs budget. In Northern Ireland, mental health services and support are fragmented and often unavailable, accessible, or quality to meet their needs.

  • Failure to realize the highest attainable standard of health

In 2018, 35% of all deaths aged 0-19 in the UK were considered avoidable. In England, too many children lack access to treatment. Only one-quarter of children with a diagnosable condition are referred for help, more than one-third of referrals are rejected, and children wait too long for treatment–an average of 53 days. Consequently, children too often reach the point of crisis requiring inpatient care rather than support in the community.

  • Inadequate action to tackle children’s food insecurity

There is no single nationwide government measure for hunger in the UK. Before the pandemic, an estimated 1.9 million children experienced food insecurity across the UK.

  • Child poverty and welfare reform

In the UK, there were 4.2 million children (30%) living in poverty in 2018/19–an increase of 600,000 from 2011/12. Poverty provides constant stress for children, 21% of whom list ‘not having enough money in their top three worries and 5% ‘not having enough food or clothes.’ Opportunities for children in poverty are also fewer: 37% of children who receive free school meals leave education without a Level 2 Qualification, compared to 18% overall.

  • Adequate housing

In Wales, in March 2020, roughly 69% of those in temporary housing were households with children, including in hostels and bed and breakfasts. In England, there is a family homelessness crisis. There were around 127,000 children in temporary accommodation pre-pandemic and approximately 90,000 families “sofa surfing” and likely to be in overcrowded accommodation.

  • Education, leisure, and cultural activities

Unequal Access to education is a concern in the UK. in Northern Ireland, many children, including care-experienced children, disabled children, Traveller children, those from ethnic minorities, disadvantaged backgrounds, and with additional needs, face significant impediments to high-quality education. In Scotland, disabled children, particularly those with autistic spectrum disorders and other disabilities, cannot access education on an equal basis.

 

  • Education on human rights and the UNCRC

Human and child rights education is not compulsory in schools in England and Scotland. In Northern Ireland, while the UNCRC and children’s rights are reflected with the school curriculum throughout Key Stages 1-4, these are not compulsory.

  • Insufficient measures to protect and support migrant, refugee, and asylum-seeking children

Asylum-seeking and refugee children and families face barriers to appropriate healthcare and education, a lack of child-friendly interview facilities, the vulnerability of exhaustion of appeal rights, deprivation, and the negative consequences of the UK government’s ‘hostile environment policy.

  • Overuse of deprivation of liberty

Across the UK, there are increasing concerns about children being unlawfully deprived of their liberty in institutional settings. In England, children can spend up to nine months in custody without a sentence. In 2019, two-thirds of remanded children did not subsequently receive a prison sentence.

  • Impact of Brexit
Europosters.fr

The European Union (EU) Withdrawal Agreement Act removes the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights from UK law, weakening legal protections for children. It contains rights with no direct equivalent in UK law, including for a child’s best interests to be a primary consideration in all actions taken by a public or private institution, a freestanding right to non-discrimination, and the right to human dignity.

Pictures are taken from the report.

“Responding to COVID-19”, UNICEF Annual Report 2020

The UNICEF released its 2020 Annual Report called “Responding to COVID-19”. As stated in the report, the COVID 19 “wiped out hard-won development gains for children and pushed more families into poverty”.

Firstly, this report points out how COVID-19 affected children in 2020. Even if children are less vulnerable to the virus than adults, school closures, increased vulnerability to abuse, the mental health strains of parents and families, distance from friends, and loss of access to vital health care and protection services have hurt children deeply. The report highlights that children were not affected equally, with children from poor countries communities and those already disadvantaged by discrimination, social exclusion, fragility and conflict more affected. The report provides some significant figures:

  • 142 million additional children were estimated to fall into monetary poverty by the end of 2020 and lack access to social protection.
  • At least 1 in 3 schoolchildren has been unable to access remote learning while their schools were closed, and 1.6 billion children and young people have been affected by school closures
  • Approximately 80 million children under age 1 may miss out on life-saving vaccines in at least 68 countries
  • Approximately 80 million children under age 1 may miss out on life-saving vaccines in at least 68 countries

To fight those figures, UNICEF established five goals areas:

  • Every child survives and thrives, focusing on health and nutrition, providing antibiotics, supporting health facilities, treating malnutrition…
  • Every child learns: focusing and education, supporting distance learning for migrant, displaced, refugee and returnee children, providing learning materials…
  • Every child is protected from violence and exploitation, through prevention, psychological support, social services
  • Every child lives in a safe and clean environment, safeguarding the rights enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child by working to reduce child poverty and end discrimination.

The pandemic made UNICEF change its strategy and choose to focus on winning support for children and young people. Communication and advocacy became even more critical in the face of the global pandemic, with digital channels widely used and advocacy playing a key role in securing the rights of children in the COVID-19 environment. This new strategy included the development of partnerships as well 146 government partners along with intergovernmental organizations and inter-organizational arrangements contributed a record $5.5 billion in resources for children globally. Innovation was also part of the new strategy with the launch of UNICEF’s first Global Innovation Strategy at the beginning of 2020. The Strategy aims to position innovation as a key tool to achieve widespread and lasting change for children.

 

By Morgane Bizien

Pictures taken from the report: https://www.unicef.org/media/100946/file/UNICEF%20Annual%20Report%202020.pdf

Graduate of Afgan Turk school Husna said education gave me the courage to fight for an equal world and make an impact in the world.

Husna Jalal  Graduate of Afghan-Turk Schools 2014

Before I begin, I would like to thank the Broken Chalk organization for arranging this event.

On Teachers International Day, I would like to appreciate and thank the efforts and hard work of the most important pillars of our society, our teachers!

It’s an honor and pleasure to be here!

I want to talk a bit about myself. I am Husna and I am from Afghanistan. I graduated from Turkish schools in Afghanistan, and Turkish schools were established in Afghanistan two decades ago during a chaotic and critical time.

My Turkish sisters and brothers came to Afghanistan when education was most needed. These schools produced a generation of intellectual and aware Afghans, moderate Muslims and change-makers, and a generation that will build Afghanistan.

Unfortunately, due to the illegal and wrong decision of the Turkish Government, our schools were closed in 2018.

After the fall of Kabul and the re-emergence of the Taliban and their dark ideology, today, Afghan girls are deprived of their fundamental rights and are banned from going to school, and 66,000 teachers are not allowed to go and teach in schools.

Also, it’s worth mentioning tonight that an educated girl is equal to an educated society.

Today, due to my teacher’s hard work and efforts, I am standing in front of you. Education gave me the courage to fight for an equal world and make an impact in the world.

I appreciate your attention and have a great evening.

Husna Jalal  Graduate of Afghan-Turk Schools 2014