श्रीलंका में शैक्षिक चुनौतियां

सारा अहमद द्वारा लिखित

परिचय

शिक्षा किसी भी देश के राजनीतिक, सामाजिक और आर्थिक विकास की नींव रखती है। 2020 में श्रीलंका की साक्षरता दर 92.38% थी। हालाँकि, श्रीलंका को अभी भी शिक्षा के क्षेत्र में कई अन्य चुनौतियों का सामना करना पड़ता है। श्रीलंका की मुक्त शिक्षा प्रणाली के नकारात्मक पक्ष और श्रम बाजार की आवश्यकताओं के प्रति शिक्षा प्रणाली की प्रतिक्रिया की कमी पर नीचे चर्चा की जाएगी।

श्रीलंका में मुफ्त शिक्षा प्रणाली का नकारात्मक पक्ष

1994 से, श्रीलंका सरकार ने बिना किसी भेदभाव के जनता के लिए एक मुफ्त शिक्षा प्रणाली शुरू की। राज्य प्राथमिक, माध्यमिक और विश्वविद्यालय स्तरों पर मुफ्त शिक्षा प्रदान करता है जो पांच से 16 वर्ष की आयु के बच्चों के लिए अनिवार्य है। इसने देश को साक्षरता दर, लिंग समानता, स्कूल नामांकन दर और मानव गुणवत्ता सूचकांक के मामले में दक्षिण एशियाई क्षेत्र में अग्रणी स्थिति में धकेल दिया था। हालाँकि, बदलती दुनिया से निपटने के लिए उत्तरोत्तर सुधार और विकास नहीं करने के लिए इसकी आलोचना की गई है।
श्रीलंका की संस्कृति उपभोग और मनोरंजन के बजाय उच्च शिक्षा उन्मुख है। नतीजतन, परिवार की आय का एक बड़ा हिस्सा माता-पिता द्वारा अपने बच्चों की शिक्षा पर खर्च किया जाता है। अधिकांश माता-पिता का अपने बच्चों को राज्य विश्वविद्यालय में भेजने का एक लंबा सपना रहा है। हालांकि, जनगणना और सांख्यिकी विभाग की रिपोर्ट के अनुसार लगभग 300,000 छात्र हैं जो सालाना उन्नत स्तर की परीक्षा में बैठते हैं और उनमें से लगभग 60% ही विश्वविद्यालय के प्रवेश के लिए योग्य हैं। फिर भी, इन योग्य छात्रों में से केवल 15% श्रीलंका के राज्य विश्वविद्यालयों में चुने गए हैं, बाकी लोगों (85%) ने राज्य विश्वविद्यालय शिक्षा में प्रवेश करने का अपना सपना खो दिया है।

मुफ्त शिक्षा आज एक महत्वपूर्ण भूमिका निभाती है लेकिन शिक्षा पर अपर्याप्त सरकारी खर्च के कारण देश में शैक्षिक मानकों में उल्लेखनीय गिरावट आई है। नतीजतन, अध्ययन के कुछ क्षेत्रों में निजी विश्वविद्यालयों की स्थापना के लिए एक उभरती मांग और सामाजिक दबाव है। निजी विश्वविद्यालयों की अवधारणा की राज्य विश्वविद्यालय के अधिकांश छात्रों के आंदोलनों और कुछ सामाजिक दबाव समूहों द्वारा कड़ी आलोचना और विरोध किया गया है। इसका एक समाधान यह हो सकता है कि विश्वविद्यालयों को समायोजित करने के लिए अतिरिक्त संसाधन आवंटित करते हुए वार्षिक विश्वविद्यालय प्रवेश संख्या में वृद्धि की जाए।
संसाधनों की कमी के कारण श्रीलंका में कुछ परीक्षाएं इतनी प्रतिस्पर्धी हो गई हैं। उदाहरण के लिए, एक छात्र की पहली सरकारी परीक्षा; ग्रेड पाँच छात्रवृत्ति अन्य परीक्षाओं की तुलना में अधिक प्रतिस्पर्धी हो गई है। ऐसा इसलिए है क्योंकि जो बेहतर अंक प्राप्त करते हैं वे एक अच्छे स्कूल और अच्छे धन के लिए भी पात्र होते हैं। इस प्रकार, अभिभावक छात्रों को इस परीक्षा के लिए कड़ी मेहनत करने के लिए मजबूर करते हैं। हालाँकि, बचपन से ही परीक्षा देने के इस दबाव का छात्रों की मानसिक स्थिरता पर बुरा प्रभाव पड़ता है।

मुफ्त शिक्षा प्रणाली का एक और नकारात्मक पक्ष यह तथ्य है कि श्रीलंका सरकार के पास पाठ्यक्रम, शिक्षण विधियों, पाठ्यक्रमों और कैरियर के रास्तों को अद्यतन करने के लिए हमेशा संसाधन नहीं होते हैं और मुफ्त और गुणवत्तापूर्ण शिक्षा के बीच का अंतर बड़ा और बड़ा होता जाता है। उचित योजना, बेहतर संसाधन आवंटन और अधिक धनराशि से निश्चित रूप से शिक्षा प्रणाली को लाभ होगा।

गुणवत्तापूर्ण शिक्षा तक पहुँच में विषमताएँ

हालाँकि श्रीलंका उच्च स्तर की साक्षरता प्राप्त करने में कामयाब रहा है, लेकिन यह छात्रों को उच्च गुणवत्ता वाली शैक्षिक सेवाएं प्रदान करने में असमर्थ रहा है। विज्ञान और गणित की शिक्षा और स्कूलों में इंटरनेट की पहुंच के मामले में श्रीलंका की स्थिति खराब है। श्रीलंका के प्रयास मुख्य रूप से बुनियादी शिक्षा (विशेष रूप से माध्यमिक) पर केंद्रित रहे हैं, जिसमें विश्वविद्यालयों जैसे उच्च स्तर की शिक्षा पर बहुत कम ध्यान दिया गया है। ज्ञान अर्थव्यवस्था में सफलतापूर्वक भाग लेने के लिए, देश को आईटी पहुंच, रचनात्मक और प्रभावी शिक्षण, बेहतर गणित और विज्ञान शिक्षा जैसे गुणवत्तापूर्ण निवेशों को बढ़ाना होगा, साथ ही साक्षरता के मौजूदा उच्च स्तरों को लगातार मजबूत करना होगा।
आई. सी. टी. तक बच्चों की पहुंच कम है। बहुत कम छात्र और उससे भी कम शिक्षक आईटी साक्षर हैं। यहां तक कि कुलीन पब्लिक स्कूलों में, कंप्यूटर सुविधाओं तक पहुंच, छात्र द्वारा कंप्यूटर अनुपात में परिभाषित 1:100 से अधिक है। छात्रों को कंप्यूटर का उपयोग करने के लिए आवश्यक व्यापक कौशल प्रदान करने के लिए अकेले कंप्यूटर पर्याप्त नहीं हैं। यह प्रशिक्षण सक्षम शिक्षकों द्वारा प्रदान किया जाना चाहिए जो न केवल छात्रों को उनका उपयोग करने के तरीके सिखाने में कुशल हैं, बल्कि दैनिक पाठों में स्वयं कंप्यूटर का उपयोग करने और उन्हें शिक्षण विधियों में शामिल करने में भी कुशल हैं।
एक अन्य मुद्दा श्रम बाजार की आवश्यकताओं के प्रति शिक्षा प्रणाली की प्रतिक्रिया की कमी है। परीक्षाओं पर ध्यान केंद्रित करते समय, इस शिक्षा प्रणाली के उत्पाद ज्ञान से परिपूर्ण होते हैं, लेकिन व्यावहारिक गतिविधियों पर कम। श्रीलंका की शिक्षा प्रणाली में यह एक बड़ी समस्या है। कई लोगों के पास सैद्धांतिक ज्ञान है, लेकिन वे अपने व्यवसायों में अच्छा प्रदर्शन नहीं कर सकते क्योंकि उनके पास नहीं है

कोविड-19 की प्रतिक्रिया

श्रीलंका में मुख्य रूप से अपने पर्यटन क्षेत्र के कारण वायरस के तेजी से फैलने का खतरा था। श्रीलंका में शैक्षिक क्षेत्र में कोविड उपायों की मुख्य चुनौतियों में से एक यह तथ्य था कि दूरस्थ शिक्षा के तौर-तरीकों को पूरे देश में समान रूप से लागू नहीं किया जा सकता था क्योंकि बच्चों के पास लैपटॉप, मोबाइल फोन, टीवी, रेडियो और व्यापक बुनियादी ढांचे तक पहुंच के विभिन्न स्तर हैं जो इन प्रणालियों का समर्थन करते हैं। उदाहरण के लिए, दूरदराज के क्षेत्रों में छात्रों की इंटरनेट और मोबाइल फोन/लैपटॉप तक पहुंच बहुत कम है। इसलिए, स्कूल बंद होने से सीखने तक पहुंच और भागीदारी में असमानता पैदा हुई है। श्रीलंका में शिक्षकों के लिए, दूरस्थ शिक्षा के तौर-तरीकों के माध्यम से पाठ्यक्रम देने में इसी तरह के संघर्ष थे।
यूनेस्को के केस स्टडी के लिए साक्षात्कार किए गए शिक्षकों ने दावा किया कि उन्होंने सूचना और संचार प्रौद्योगिकी (आईसीटी) या दूरस्थ शिक्षा पर कोई प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त नहीं किया है और अक्सर अपने छात्रों को पढ़ाते रहने के लिए खुद को पढ़ाना या अन्य रचनात्मक समाधान खोजना पड़ता था। यूनेस्को के शोध से पता चलता है कि शैक्षणिक क्षेत्र में एक बड़ी कमी, जो कोविड से पहले भी मौजूद थी, निगरानी प्रणालियों की कमी थी जो शिक्षा की प्रभावी प्रणाली को सुनिश्चित करने के लिए आवश्यक है। यूनेस्को ने अपनी रिपोर्ट में श्रीलंका को शिक्षा के क्षेत्र में एक प्रभावी निगरानी प्रणाली लागू करने की भी सिफारिश की।

निष्कर्ष

श्रीलंका में शिक्षा तक पहुंच निःशुल्क है और इसके परिणामस्वरूप देश की उच्च साक्षरता दर है। हालांकि, शिक्षा प्रणाली बेहद प्रतिस्पर्धी है और भारी काम के बोझ, प्रतिस्पर्धा और बेहतर परिणाम प्राप्त करने के लिए माता-पिता के दबाव के कारण स्कूली छात्रों का खराब शारीरिक और मानसिक स्वास्थ्य एक ऐसा मुद्दा है जिसकी नीति निर्माताओं द्वारा परवाह और चिंता नहीं की गई है। इसलिए श्रीलंका के लिए यह अनुशंसा की जाती है कि वह छात्रों के शारीरिक और मानसिक स्वास्थ्य पर कार्यभार के प्रभाव पर विचार करे और शिक्षा प्रणाली से श्रम बाजार की आवश्यकताओं के प्रति बेहतर प्रतिक्रिया पैदा करने के लिए कक्षा सीखने से गतिविधि-आधारित सीखने पर ध्यान केंद्रित करे। पूरी दुनिया बदल रही है और श्रीलंका को हमेशा सुविधाओं, प्रणालियों और प्रौद्योगिकियों सहित हर चीज के साथ समानांतर रूप से आगे बढ़ने का प्रयास करना चाहिए।

 

संदर्भ

किंग्सले करुणारत्ने अलावतटेगामा, ‘फ्री एजुकेशन पॉलिसी एंड इट्स इमर्जिंग चैलेंजेस इन श्रीलंका’, श्री जयवर्धनेपुरा विश्वविद्यालय, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1250461.pdf

मैक्रोट्रेंड, ‘श्रीलंका साक्षरता दर 1981-2023’ अंतिम बार 22 अप्रैल 2023 को पहुँचा गया

रमीज एट अल, श्रीलंका में उच्च शिक्षा क्षेत्रों पर कोविड-19 का प्रभावः श्रीलंका के दक्षिण पूर्वी विश्वविद्यालय पर आधारित एक अध्ययन, जर्नल ऑफ एजुकेशनल एंड सोशल रिसर्च (volume 10, No 6, November 2020).

रेव मिनुवांगोडा ज्ञानवासा, ‘वर्तमान में श्रीलंका के सामने कुछ मान्यता प्राप्त शैक्षिक मुद्दों का अध्ययन’ (एपीसीएआर 2017) https://apiar.org.au/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/04/6 _ APCAR _ MAR _ 2017 _ BRR739 _ Education-35-42. pdf

सामाजिक सुरक्षा टूलबॉक्स, ‘श्रीलंका की सार्वभौमिक शिक्षा प्रणाली’ https://www.socialprotection-toolbox.org/practice/sri-lankas-universal-education-system

टीम नेक्स्ट ट्रैवल श्रीलंका, ‘ऑल अबाउट फ्री एजुकेशन इन श्रीलंका’ (2021) https://nexttravelsrilanka.com/free-education-in-sri-lanka /

यूनेस्को, श्रीलंकाः केस स्टडीः ‘एशिया में शिक्षा क्षेत्र पर कोविड-19 के प्रभावों और प्रतिक्रियाओं पर स्थिति विश्लेषण’ (2021)

विशेष छवि है: स्कूल जाते समय छात्र उच्च दबाव की रिपोर्ट करते हैं-ग्राउंडव्यू द्वारा फोटो।

 

Educational Challenges in Sri Lanka – Urdu Translation

سری لنکا میں تعلیمی چیلنجز

 

تحریر: سارا احمد

ترجمہ: ماہ نور علی

تعارف

تعلیم کسی بھی ملک کی سیاسی، سماجی اور اقتصادی ترقی کی بنیاد ہے۔ 2020 میں سری لنکا کی خواندگی کی شرح 92.38% تھی، لیکن اس کے باوجود ملک کو تعلیمی شعبے میں مختلف چیلنجز کا سامنا ہے۔ اس مضمون میں سری لنکا کے مفت تعلیمی نظام کے منفی پہلوؤں اور اس نظام کی لیبر مارکیٹ کی ضروریات سے ہم آہنگ نہ ہونے پر بات کی جائے گی۔

سری لنکا کے مفت تعلیمی نظام کے منفی پہلو

نائنٹین نائنٹی فورسے سری لنکا کی حکومت نے بغیر کسی امتیاز کے عوام کے لیے مفت تعلیمی نظام کا آغاز کیا۔ ریاست ابتدائی، ثانوی، اور یونیورسٹی سطح پر مفت تعلیم فراہم کرتی ہے، اور پانچ سے سولہ سال کے بچوں کے لیے تعلیم لازمی قرار دی گئی ہے۔ اس نظام نے سری لنکا کو خواندگی، صنفی مساوات، اور اسکول میں داخلے کی شرح کے لحاظ سے جنوبی ایشیا میں نمایاں مقام دلانے میں مدد دی۔ تاہم، اس نظام کو جدید دنیا کے تقاضوں کے مطابق ترقی دینے میں ناکامی پر تنقید کا سامنا ہے۔

سری لنکن معاشرہ تعلیم پر زیادہ زور دیتا ہے اور تفریح یا غیر ضروری اخراجات پر کم توجہ دیتا ہے۔ اس وجہ سے والدین اپنی آمدنی کا ایک بڑا حصہ اپنے بچوں کی تعلیم پر خرچ کرتے ہیں۔ زیادہ تر والدین کا خواب ہوتا ہے کہ ان کے بچے کسی سرکاری یونیورسٹی میں تعلیم حاصل کریں۔ تاہم، محکمہ مردم شماری اور شماریات کے مطابق ہر سال تقریباً 300,000 طلباء اعلیٰ سطح کے امتحان میں شرکت کرتے ہیں، لیکن ان میں سے صرف 60% یونیورسٹی کے داخلے کے اہل ہوتے ہیں۔ ان اہل طلباء میں سے بھی صرف 15% کو ہی سرکاری یونیورسٹیوں میں داخلہ ملتا ہے، اور باقی 85% طلباء کا خواب ادھورا رہ جاتا ہے۔

اگرچہ مفت تعلیم کا نظام اہم کردار ادا کرتا ہے، لیکن حکومت کی طرف سے تعلیم پر ناکافی اخراجات کی وجہ سے تعلیمی معیار میں کمی آئی ہے۔ نتیجتاً، کچھ شعبوں میں نجی یونیورسٹیاں قائم کرنے کا مطالبہ اور دباؤ بڑھ رہا ہے۔ تاہم، ریاستی یونیورسٹی کے طلباء اور سماجی تنظیموں کی طرف سے نجی یونیورسٹیوں کے قیام کی مخالفت کی جا رہی ہے۔ اس مسئلے کا ایک حل یہ ہو سکتا ہے کہ حکومت یونیورسٹیوں میں داخلے کی سالانہ تعداد میں اضافہ کرے اور ان اداروں کے لیے مزید وسائل مختص کرے۔

وسائل کی کمی کے باعث کچھ امتحانات انتہائی مسابقتی ہو چکے ہیں۔ مثال کے طور پر، پانچویں جماعت کا وظیفہ امتحان طلباء کے لیے بہت مشکل ہوتا ہے، کیونکہ اعلیٰ نمبر حاصل کرنے والے طلباء کو اچھے اسکول اور وظائف ملتے ہیں۔ والدین بچوں پر امتحان میں کامیابی کے لیے دباؤ ڈالتے ہیں، لیکن کم عمری میں اس قسم کے دباؤ کا طلباء کی ذہنی صحت پر منفی اثر پڑتا ہے۔

مفت تعلیمی نظام کا ایک اور مسئلہ یہ ہے کہ حکومت کے پاس نصاب، تدریسی طریقوں، اور کورسز کو اپ ڈیٹ کرنے کے لیے درکار وسائل نہیں ہوتے، جس کے نتیجے میں معیاری اور مفت تعلیم کے درمیان خلا بڑھتا جا رہا ہے۔ بہتر منصوبہ بندی، وسائل کی منصفانہ تقسیم، اور اضافی فنڈز تعلیمی نظام کو بہتر بنا سکتے ہیں

معیاری تعلیم تک رسائی میں تفاوت

اگرچہ سری لنکا نے خواندگی کی بلند سطح حاصل کی ہے، لیکن معیاری تعلیمی خدمات فراہم کرنے میں ناکامی کا سامنا ہے۔ سری لنکا ریاضی اور سائنس کی تعلیم اور اسکولوں میں انٹرنیٹ تک رسائی کے معاملے میں پیچھے ہے۔ تعلیمی نظام کا زیادہ تر زور بنیادی تعلیم پر ہے، جبکہ اعلیٰ تعلیم اور یونیورسٹیوں پر کم توجہ دی گئی ہے۔

معاشی ترقی اور عالمی منڈی میں مسابقت کے لیے سری لنکا کو آئی ٹی کی تعلیم، جدید تدریسی طریقوں، اور ریاضی و سائنس کی بہتر تعلیم کو فروغ دینا ہوگا۔

بچوں کی انفارمیشن ٹیکنالوجی (ICT) تک رسائی بہت محدود ہے، اور زیادہ تر طلباء اور اساتذہ کو کمپیوٹر کے استعمال میں مہارت حاصل نہیں۔ حتیٰ کہ بڑے پبلک اسکولوں میں بھی ایک کمپیوٹر کے لیے 100 سے زیادہ طلباء موجود ہوتے ہیں۔ لیکن کمپیوٹر کی موجودگی کافی نہیں، بلکہ ایسے اساتذہ کی ضرورت ہے جو کمپیوٹر کے استعمال میں ماہر ہوں اور اس مہارت کو تدریسی عمل کا حصہ بنائیں۔

تعلیمی نظام اور مزدور منڈی کی ضروریات میں ہم آہنگی کا فقدان

سری لنکا کا تعلیمی نظام طلباء کو زیادہ تر علمی علم فراہم کرتا ہے، لیکن عملی مہارتوں پر کم زور دیا جاتا ہے۔ اس وجہ سے، طلباء نظریاتی طور پر مضبوط ہونے کے باوجود پیشہ ورانہ میدان میں اچھی کارکردگی نہیں دکھا پاتے۔ یہ مسئلہ مزدور منڈی میں عملی اور نظریاتی علم کے درمیان خلا پیدا کرتا ہے۔

کووڈ-19 کا ردعمل

سری لنکا کا سیاحت پر انحصار ہونے کی وجہ سے کووڈ-19 کے تیز پھیلاؤ کا خطرہ زیادہ تھا۔ تعلیمی شعبے میں ایک بڑا چیلنج یہ تھا کہ فاصلاتی تعلیم کے لیے یکساں سہولیات دستیاب نہیں تھیں۔ مختلف علاقوں کے بچوں کو لیپ ٹاپ، موبائل فونز اور انٹرنیٹ تک رسائی میں مشکلات کا سامنا تھا، خاص طور پر دیہی علاقوں میں۔

اساتذہ کو بھی فاصلاتی تعلیم کے لیے مناسب تربیت نہیں دی گئی تھی، اور انہیں خود سے تدریسی طریقے سیکھنے پڑے۔ یونیسکو کی رپورٹ کے مطابق، تعلیمی شعبے میں ایک بڑی کمی مانیٹرنگ کے مؤثر نظام کی غیر موجودگی تھی، جو کووڈ سے پہلے بھی مسئلہ تھا۔ یونیسکو نے سفارش کی کہ سری لنکا میں تعلیمی نظام کو بہتر بنانے کے لیے ایک مؤثر مانیٹرنگ نظام نافذ کیا جائے۔

نتیجہ

سری لنکا میں مفت تعلیم کی وجہ سے خواندگی کی شرح بلند ہے، لیکن تعلیمی نظام میں مقابلے کی فضا اور والدین کا دباؤ طلباء کی جسمانی اور ذہنی صحت پر منفی اثرات مرتب کر رہا ہے۔ پالیسی سازوں کو طلباء کی صحت کے مسائل پر توجہ دینی چاہیے اور نصابی تعلیم کے بجائے عملی سرگرمیوں پر مبنی تعلیم کو فروغ دینا چاہیے تاکہ تعلیمی نظام کو مزدور منڈی کی ضروریات سے ہم آہنگ کیا جا سکے۔ دنیا تیزی سے بدل رہی ہے، اور سری لنکا کو بھی جدید ٹیکنالوجی اور تعلیمی سہولیات کے ساتھ ترقی کی دوڑ میں شامل رہنا ہوگا۔

References

Babies behind bars

Written by Sara Ahmed

Turkish President Erdoğan has been targeting followers of the Gülen movement since the corruption investigations of December 2013. According to data from January 2023, around 520 children under six are in prison with their mothers in Turkey. Around 14.000 women are in Turkish prisons; children accompany 470. The facilities and conditions in which these babies and children live are deplorable. No child should have to go through that.

After the aftermath of a coup attempt in July 2016, thousands of women were unlawfully jailed in Turkish prisons. The number of children accompanying their mothers in prison skyrocketed in Turkey after the coup attempt. Children and their mothers are being illegally held in prisons in poor conditions. The actual problem is not the conditions of the prisons, but the problem is that the babies are in prison. Prisons are not a place for babies and small children to grow up. These are the most fundamental years for children to grow up and enjoy life. Being held in prison and not exposed to real life can lead to traumas in later life. Children should be free and explore the world, not be stored in a place lacking the facilities to host these babies and children.

Turkey’s penal code states that mothers with children younger than six months should have their prison sentences suspended. This rule, however, doesn’t apply when individuals are convicted of having links to a terrorist organization. Many of these women are often being accused of being “FETO” members, which, most of the time, are baseless accusations. If the father is at home, the children are still forced to grow up in prison instead of with the child’s father.

Inmates are suffering from freezing temperatures, foul drinking water and poor treatment. The adverse effects were even worse during the Covid Pandemic, which lowered the already low prison standards. The research by the Rights of Life Association (published in September 2021) made several recommendations, including deferred sentences for women who have a child younger than six-years-old and access to gynecologists for pregnant women and pediatricians for infants and children constantly.

These babies and children have done nothing wrong and should not be punished for something their parents might have done. Children should not have to grow up behind bars.

Children are being cut off from the outside world and cannot participate in social and cultural activities. That harms physical and mental well-being and will cause problems connecting with society later in life. Turkey should consider how this impacts the child’s and the parent’s lives.

References:

https://kronos36.news/tr/sezgin-tanrikulu-470-anne-520-bebekle-cezaevinde/

https://www.dw.com/en/turkey-babies-behind-bars/a-49320769

520 children under the age of 6 in prison with their mothers in Turkey: report

Universal Periodic Review of Cameroon

  • Broken Chalk drafted this report to contribute to Cameroon’s fourth Universal Periodic Review (UPR). Since Broken Chalk is specifically concerned with human rights and inequalities in education, this report focuses on the right to education in Cameroon.
  • This report first explores the main issues with the right to education in Cameroon. It also reflects on the recommendations Cameroon received in the 3rd cycle UN UPR review in 2018 and its progress since. Finally, Broken Chalk offers some suggestions to Cameroon on further improving and protecting the right to education.
  • In the 2018 review, Cameroon received 196 recommendations and accepted 139 submissions at the adoption of its UPR outcome. Those were related to the legal and general framework of implementation, universal and cross-cutting issues, civil and political rights, economic, social, and cultural rights, women’s and children’s rights, and rights of other vulnerable groups and persons.[1]
  • Regarding education, those recommendations focused on guaranteeing equal access to education (ensuring that primary education is free and accessible to all children), paying particular attention to children living in remote areas and minorities, enhancing literacy rates (especially among women); and promoting the education of indigenous children.
  • Cameroon has stated that efforts to guarantee the most comprehensive coverage and highest possible quality of education at all levels have been intensified. The 2013-2020 Strategy Paper for the Education Sector was approved.[2] This programme is structured around three main areas: access and equity, quality and relevance and management and governance. Furthermore, as part of the effort to reduce disparities where they exist as a means of boosting school enrolment rates, emphasis is being placed on ensuring that education is entirely free at the primary level by doing away with school fees.[3] Additionally, Cameroon stated in its 2018 national report that it had made efforts to raise the school enrolment rate for girls (as was recommended) by including the organisation of awareness campaigns and the provision of incentives in the form of scholarships and instructional kits for girls. [4]
by Sara Ahmed

Download PDF

44th_Session_UN-UPR_Country_Review_Cameroon

[1] United Nations Human Rights Council. (2018). Universal Periodic Review – Cameroon.

[2] United Nations Human Rights Council. (2018). Universal Periodic Review – Cameroon, National Report, Para 58.

[3] Ibid, para 59.

[4] Ibid, para 63.

Cover image by Pete unseth on Wikimedia Commons.

Educational challenges in Pakistan

Written by Sara Ahmed

 

Introduction

Education lays the foundation for political, social and economic development of any country.[1] As a developing country, Pakistan has faced many critical problems when it comes to education and has one of the world’s highest numbers of out-of-school children (OOSC). There are various factors responsible for the educational situation in Pakistan. This article explores some of the challenges that Pakistan faces when it comes to the educational sector.

The Pakistani educational system

The Pakistani educational system exists of public schools, private schools and madrassas. Madrassas are working as Islamic Seminaries; they are imparting Islamic education at graduation level and are often found in more rural areas of Pakistan. These different institutions all have different mediums of teaching, curricula, and also examination systems. This is a barrier in the countries education sector, because it has become a dividing force between the privileged and underprivileged people in the society, leading to economic disparity.[2]

Across all levels of education, the public sector remains the main provider for educational services in Pakistan. Except for the pre-primary level, total enrollment in public schools is almost double compared to private schools.[3] The majority of public schools in Pakistan are primary schools; only 20% are middle and secondary schools. Limited and uneven school access is one of the most daunting challenges for augmenting school enrollment and completion.

Image 1

As can be seen from Image 1, The United Nations Development Program mentioned that in 2020, 64% of the Pakistani youth lived in urban areas and 26% in rural areas. 70% of the Pakistani youth was literate, while 30% was illiterate in 2020. Furthermore, 39% of the youth was employed, while the majority (61%) was unemployed and only 4% looking for a job. Another issue is the access to internet. Only 15% of the youth had access to internet in 2020, while 85% did not. 48% of the youth did not even have a mobile phone. The latter was a huge issue during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Pakistan.

 

Another important issue is that of gender disparity. Throughout Pakistan’s educational system, there is a gender disparity between males and females. According to the 2016 Global Gender Gap Report, Pakistan was ranked the second worst country in the world regarding gender inequality.[4] This is of most concern in more rural areas where access to education for girls is limited.

Out-of-school children (OOSC) and literacy rates

Another major problem that Pakistan faces is that it has one of the world highest numbers of OOSC. Estimated is that 22.8 million children between the age of 5-16 are not attending school; representing 44 per cent of the total population in this age group.[5] The disparities based on gender, socio-economic status and geography are significant. In Sindh for example, 52 per cent of the poorest children (of which 58 per cent are girls) are out of school. The figures are even higher in Balochistan, where 78 per cent of girls are out of school.[6]

Image 2.

On image 2, one can see the different stages of education; the number of children enrolled in the type of education and the number of out-of-school children in that stage.

The socio-economic disparities in Pakistan do not only exist between rural an urban regions, but also between the different provinces in Pakistan. This has an impact on educational outcomes, including gaps in access to education and overall education attainment. A good example is the literacy rate in Pakistan. In the bigger cities, such as Lahore and Islamabad and Karachi, the literacy rates are almost 75%. On the other hand, we have the tribal regions in Balochistan (Pakistan’s poorest and largest province) where the literacy rates can be as low as 9%.[7]

Quality of education

According to a report of UNESCO, the quality of educational institutions and teachers in Pakistan is very low. In remote parts of Pakistan, the availability of teachers is drastically lower.[8] There are also a lot of so called ‘ghost teachers’ that sap public payrolls by not showing up for work. While most of these problems are worse at the elementary level, where most of Pakistan’s students are enrolled, they have ripple effects for the entire education system and depress enrollment rates at all levels.

Furthermore, teachers are often not provided with the necessary equipment’s and training for the knowledge and skills. The main reason is the poor management, lack of finding and improper training standards. In addition to this, the curriculum is often outdated, resulting in a major lack of professional development.

Most students in Pakistan attend public schools. Public schools often do not contribute to a positive learning environment. The classrooms tend to be overcrowded, the electricity and air conditioning is not always working, insufficient use of playgrounds and libraries and most schools do not have commuting systems in place, which exacerbated female drop-out rates. Long home- to-school distances and poor transportation and communication facilities are among the important causes of dropout at the primary level in Pakistan. Poor children, especially girls who are not allowed to travel long distances alone, suffer the most as commuting costs and time increase.

In an interview with TCM Originals, Tariq Banury (a Pakistani educationist, professor and economist), opens up about the current struggles of the Pakistani educational system. He explains that a lot of students, after finishing their degree, do not have the basic skills they should possess. He blames the process in which professors are hired and the outdated curriculum. He continues to explain that professors and curriculum should not stand still, but should evolve with time and science available.[9]

Another major issue is the government’s annual spending on the educational field. Most of the United Nation’s agencies recommend countries to spend a minimum expenditure of 4% on education. Pakistan had only spent 1,77% of GDP on education in 2021-2022. In recent years, the highest percentage of GDP Pakistan has spent on education was in 2017-18, when education expenditures were raised to 2.12%. The usual argument given for lack of spending on education has always been and still is that Pakistan does not have the resources to increase the level of spending on the educational field.[10]

The effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 Pandemic also had its effect on Pakistan and its educational system. Because of COVID-19, Pakistan had to consider using online classes. However, many students, especially in rural areas, do not and did not have access to the Internet. Students who are on the lower ladder of the economical circle and students who live in rural areas had been greatly disadvantaged by this new learning method. Many students did not have access to a laptop or even internet. This has greatly impacted the lives of many students in Pakistan, who therefore could not access their education online.[11] This has also resulted in high drop-out rates across the various levels of education in Pakistan.[12]

Low-income families have been the hardest hit by the pandemic. High rates of poverty have put more burden on adolescent girls to stay at home to reduce schooling costs. Coupled with household chores and early marriage, many may never return to the classrooms.[13]  Pakistan was already struggling with high illiteracy rates, the Pandemic has made this situation even worse and has affected the learning of approximately 40 million students across Pakistan.[14]

Conclusion

Pakistan’s educational system has improved over the years, but still tends to rely too heavily on outdated teaching and examination methods. While great strides have been made in improving literacy and participation rates, the education system remains largely elitist with access to the best educational opportunities available only to the more affluent or well-connected students. Furthermore, the COVID-19 Pandemic has had a great impact on the lives of many students who could not access education at the time and increased the drop-out rates across all educational levels in Pakistan. Additionally, Pakistan does not spend the suggested minimum amount of 4% of GDP on education, the percentage is not even half of the suggested amount by the United Nations Bodies. Pakistan does have the intention to increase its annually spending on the educational field. Is this a feasible goal? Only time can tell. In the meantime, many students will still struggle to access the educational system of Pakistan.

 

 

References

 

[1] Iqbal Ahmad et al, ‘Critical analysis of the problems of education in Pakistan: possible solutions’, IJERE (3:2) June 2014, p 79.

[2] Robert Hunter, World Education Services: Education in Pakistan (2020), >https://wenr.wes.org/2020/02/education-in-pakistan< accessed on 5 March 2023.

[3] ADB Briefs, ‘Access Challenges to Education in Pakistan’ (2022), NO. 27, <https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/771091/adb-brief-207-access-challenges-education-pakistan.pdf< accessed on 6 March 2023.

[4] World Economic Forum, ‘Global Gender Gap Report 2016’ (2016) p 22.

[5] Unicef, ‘Education: giving every child the right to education’, <https://www.unicef.org/pakistan/education> accessed on 6 March 2023.

[6] Idem.

[7] Robert Hunter, World Education Services: Education in Pakistan (2020), >https://wenr.wes.org/2020/02/education-in-pakistan< accessed on 5 March 2023.

[8] Unicef, ‘Education: giving every child the right to education’, <https://www.unicef.org/pakistan/education> accessed on 6 March 2023.

[9] TCM Orginals, ‘Does Pakistan’s Higher Education System Need Reform? Educationist Tariq Banuri’ (2021), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPkv9hEIUJw.

[10] Sahiba Abid, ‘Education in Pakistan: problems, challenges and perspectives (2022) >https://www.pakistangulfeconomist.com/2022/08/29/education-in-pakistan-problems-challenges-and-perspectives/< accessed on 3 March 2023.

[11] Adnan Muhammad “Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students perspectives” (2020) Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 1 (2): 45–51.

[12] Rabea Malik, ‘The Impact of COVID-19 on education in Pakistan’ (2020), https://www.cambridge.org/partnership/research/challenges-and-opportunities-pakistan-education-systems-covid-19-response.

[13] Anooshay Abid, ‘How has COVID impacted Pakistans’s education system?’ (2021), https://www.dw.com/en/how-has-covid-impacted-pakistans-education-system/a-59264829.

[14] Idem.

Educational challenges in Sri Lanka

Written by Sara Ahmed

Introduction

Education lays the foundation for political, social and economic development of any country. The literacy rate of Sri Lankans in 2020 was 92.38%. However, Sri Lanka still faces many other challenges in the educational field. The downside of the free educational system of Sri Lanka and the lack of responsiveness of the educational system to the labour market requirements will be discussed below.

The downside of the free educational system in Sri Lanka

Since 1994, the Sri Lankan government, initiated a free education system for the public without any discrimination. The State provides free education at primary, secondary and university levels that is compulsory for children between five and 16 years of age. This had pushed the country forward into a leading position in the South Asian region in terms of literacy rate, gender parity, school enrolment rate and human quality index. However, it has been criticized for not being progressively improved and developed to cope with the changing world.

The Sri Lankan culture is highly education oriented rather than consumption and entertainment oriented. As a result, a significant proportion of the household income is spent by the parents on their children’s education. It has been a long dream of most of the parents to send their children to a state university. However, according to the reports of the Department of Census and Statistics there are about 300,000 students that annually sit for the Advanced Level Examination and approximately only a 60% percent of them are qualified for the university entrance. Nevertheless, out of these qualified students just about 15% are selected to the state universities of Sri Lanka leaving the rest of the people (85%) losing their dream to enter state university education.

Free education does play a key role today but insufficient government spending on education has led to a marked decline in educational standards in the country. Consequently, there is an emerging demand and social pressure for establishing private universities in certain fields of studies. The concept of private universities has been severely criticized and opposed by the majority of state university students’ movements and some of the social pressure groups. A solution for this could be to increase the annual university entrance intake while allocating additional resources to universities to accommodate them.        Due to lack of resources, certain examinations have become so competitive in Sri Lanka. For instance, the first government examination of a student; the Grade five scholarship has become more competitive than other examinations. That is because those who obtain better higher marks are eligible to have a good school and also good funds. Thus, parents force students to work hard for this exam. However, this pressure to take an examination since childhood has a bad impact on the mental stability of the students.

Another downside of the free educational system is the fact that the Sri Lankan government does not always have the resources to update the curriculums, teaching methods, courses, and career paths and the gap between free and quality education becomes bigger and bigger. Proper planning, better resource allocations, and more funds would certainly benefit the education system.

Disparities in access to quality education

Although Sri Lanka has managed to achieve high levels of literacy, it has been unable to provide students with high quality educational services. Sri Lanka ranks poorly in terms of science and math education and internet access in schools. Sri Lanka’s efforts have been primarily concentrated on basic education (particularly secondary), with much less focus on higher levels of education, such as universities. In order to participate successfully in the knowledge economy, the country will have to increase quality inputs such as IT access, constructive and effective teaching, better math and science education, whilst constantly consolidating existing high levels of literacy.          

Children’s access to ICT is low.  Few students and even fewer teachers are IT literate. Even in the elite public schools, access to computer facilities, defined by the student to computer ratio is well over 1:100. Computers alone are not enough to provide students with the comprehensive skills needed to use computers. This training should be supplied by capable teachers who are skilled in not only teaching students how to use them, but also using computers, themselves, in daily lessons and incorporating them into teaching methods.

Another issue is the lack of responsiveness of the educational system to the labour market requirements. While concentrating on exams, the products of this education system are fulfilled with knowledge, but less on practical activities. This is a major problem in the educational system of Sri Lanka. Many people have the theoretical knowledge, but they can’t perform well in their professions because they don’t have much practice on those things. This creates issues in the labour market and leads to a gap between theoretical and practical knowledge.

Covid-19 response

Sri Lanka was very prone to a fast spread of the virus mainly due to its tourism sector. One of the main challenges of the Covid measures in the educational sector in Sri Lanka was the fact that the distance learning modalities could not be uniformly applied across the nation as children have varying levels of access to laptops, mobile phones, TV, radio and the broader infrastructure that supports these systems. Students in remote areas for example, have no to very little access to internet and mobile phones/laptops. Hence, school closures have led to inequity in access to and participation in learning. For teachers in Sri Lanka, there were similar struggles in delivering the curriculum through distance learning modalities.

The teachers interviewed for the case study of UNESCO claimed to not have received any training on information and communications technology (ICT) or distance learning and had often had to teach themselves or find other creative solutions to keep teaching to its students. The UNESCO research shows that a major lack in the educational sector, which also existed before COVID, was the lack of monitoring systems which is needed to ensure and effective system of education. UNESCO, in its report, also recommended Sri Lanka to implement an effective monitoring system in the education field.

Conclusion

Access to education in Sri Lanka is free and has resulted to high literacy rates of the country. However, the education system is extremely competitive and poor physical and mental health of the school students due to heavy workload, competition, and pressure from the parents for getting better results is an issue that has not been cared and concerned for by the policy makers. It is therefore recommended for Sri Lanka to consider the impact of the workload on the students’ physical and mental health and divert the focus from classroom learning to activity-based learning to create better responsiveness from the education system to the labour market requirements. The whole world is changing, and Sri Lanka should always try to move parallelly with everything including facilities, systems, and technologies.

References